Department of Psychology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Department of Psychology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Social Cognitive Neuroscience and Mental Health, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;293:114677. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114677. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
The absence of pharmaceutical interventions made it particularly difficult to mitigate the first outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The current study investigated how interpersonal trust and institutional trust influenced the control process. Trusts and COVID-19 data in 44 countries and 50 US states were analyzed; institutional trust was associated with case fatality rate, and interpersonal trust was associated with control speed. Two independent behavioral experiments showed that institutional trust manipulation increased participants' willingness to complete the COVID-19 test and that interpersonal trust manipulation increased conscious compliance with prevention norms and decreased unnecessary outdoor activities. Agent-based modeling further confirmed these behavioral mechanisms for two types of trust in the COVID-19 control process. New interventions are needed to help countries heighten interpersonal and institutional trust as they continue to battle COVID-19 and other collective threats.
缺乏药物干预使得缓解 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的首次爆发变得尤为困难。本研究调查了人际信任和制度信任如何影响控制过程。分析了 44 个国家和 50 个美国州的信任和 COVID-19 数据;制度信任与病死率有关,人际信任与控制速度有关。两项独立的行为实验表明,制度信任操纵增加了参与者完成 COVID-19 检测的意愿,人际信任操纵增加了对预防规范的自觉遵守,减少了不必要的户外活动。基于主体的建模进一步证实了这两种信任在 COVID-19 控制过程中的行为机制。在继续应对 COVID-19 和其他集体威胁时,需要采取新的干预措施来帮助各国提高人际信任和制度信任。