Suppr超能文献

大流行时期对科学家的信任:来自 12 个国家的小组证据。

Trust in scientists in times of pandemic: Panel evidence from 12 countries.

机构信息

Economics Department, Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC) Paris, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France;

Economics Department, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 5;118(40). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108576118.

Abstract

This article analyzes the specific and critical role of trust in scientists on both the support for and compliance with nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. We exploit large-scale, longitudinal, and representative surveys for 12 countries over the period from March to December 2020, and we complement the analysis with experimental data. We find that trust in scientists is the key driving force behind individual support for and compliance with NPIs and for favorable attitudes toward vaccination. The effect of trust in government is more ambiguous and tends to diminish support for and compliance with NPIs in countries where the recommendations from scientists and the government were not aligned. Trust in others also has seemingly paradoxical effects: in countries where social trust is high, the support for NPIs is low due to higher expectations that others will voluntary social distance. Our individual-level longitudinal data also allows us to evaluate the effects of within-person changes in trust over the pandemic: we show that trust levels and, in particular, trust in scientists have changed dramatically for individuals and within countries, with important subsequent effects on compliant behavior and support for NPIs. Such findings point out the challenging but critical need to maintain trust in scientists during a lasting pandemic that strains citizens and governments.

摘要

本文分析了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,信任科学家这一因素在民众对非药物干预措施(NPIs)的支持和遵守方面所起的具体而关键的作用。我们利用了 2020 年 3 月至 12 月期间 12 个国家的大规模、纵向和代表性调查,并通过实验数据对分析进行了补充。我们发现,对科学家的信任是个人支持和遵守 NPIs 以及对疫苗接种持有利态度的关键驱动力。对政府的信任的影响则更为模糊,并且在科学家和政府的建议不一致的国家,这种信任往往会削弱对 NPIs 的支持和遵守。对他人的信任也似乎具有矛盾的影响:在社会信任度较高的国家,由于人们期望他人会自愿保持社交距离,因此对 NPIs 的支持度较低。我们的个人层面纵向数据还使我们能够评估个人在大流行期间信任度变化的影响:我们表明,信任水平,尤其是对科学家的信任度,在个人和国家内部都发生了巨大变化,这对遵守行为和对 NPIs 的支持产生了重要的后续影响。这些发现指出了在持续大流行期间,维持对科学家的信任这一具有挑战性但至关重要的需求,因为这会给公民和政府带来压力。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Political expression of academics on Twitter.学者在推特上的政治表达。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02199-1.

本文引用的文献

5
Epidemics and trust: The case of the Spanish Flu.传染病与信任:西班牙流感的案例。
Health Econ. 2021 Apr;30(4):840-857. doi: 10.1002/hec.4218. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
7
Civic capital and social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的公民资本与社会距离
J Public Econ. 2021 Jan;193:104310. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104310. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间对公共卫生政策的信任与遵守
J Public Econ. 2020 Dec;192:104316. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104316. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验