Department of Engineering for Livestock Management, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Institute for Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, Building 21, 14163, Berlin, Germany.
Vet Res Commun. 2022 Dec;46(4):1221-1225. doi: 10.1007/s11259-022-09984-7. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
Respiration rate (RR) is a proficient indicator to measure the health status of cattle. The common method of measurement is to count the number of respiratory cycles each minute based on flank movements. However, there is no consistent method of execution. In previous studies, various methods have been described, including counting flank movements for 15 s, 30 s or 60 s as well as stopping the time for 5 or 10 breaths. We assume that the accuracy of the aforementioned methods differs. Therefore, we compared their precision with an RR sensor, which was used as the reference method in this study. Five scientists from the fields of agricultural science and veterinary medicine quantified the flank movement according to each of the five methods mentioned above. The results showed that with an average RR of 30 breaths per minute (bpm), all methods showed a high correlation to the values of the RR sensor. However, counting breaths for 60 s had the highest level of conformity with the RR sensor (Lin`s concordance correlation coefficient: 0.96) regardless of the level of RR. With rising RR, the inaccuracy increased significantly for the other four investigated methods, especially when counting 5 and 10 breaths. Therefore, we would recommend that counting for 60 s should be used as the standard method for future studies due to its high precision regardless of the level of RR.
呼吸频率(RR)是衡量牛健康状况的一个有效指标。常用的测量方法是根据侧胸壁运动来计算每分钟的呼吸次数。然而,目前还没有统一的执行方法。在以前的研究中,已经描述了各种方法,包括计数 15 秒、30 秒或 60 秒的侧胸壁运动次数,以及停止呼吸 5 或 10 次的时间。我们假设上述方法的准确性存在差异。因此,我们使用 RR 传感器作为参考方法,比较了它们的精度。来自农业科学和兽医领域的五位科学家根据上述五种方法中的每一种来量化侧胸壁运动。结果表明,在平均 RR 为 30 次/分钟(bpm)的情况下,所有方法与 RR 传感器的值都具有高度相关性。然而,无论 RR 水平如何,计数 60 秒的方法与 RR 传感器的一致性最高(Lin 的一致性相关系数:0.96)。随着 RR 的增加,其他四种方法的不准确性显著增加,尤其是在计数 5 次和 10 次呼吸时。因此,我们建议在未来的研究中应使用计数 60 秒作为标准方法,因为无论 RR 水平如何,它的精度都很高。