• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“可接受风险”的概念:效用在药物管理中的作用。

The notion of "acceptable risk": the role of utility in drug management.

作者信息

Lane D A, Hutchinson T A

出版信息

J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):621-5. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90023-3.

DOI:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90023-3
PMID:3597662
Abstract

This paper presents a definition of "acceptable risk" that is based on the concept of utility. The adverse effects of a specific use of a drug pose an acceptable risk if no alternative treatment has a higher cumulated expected utility in the relevant patient population than that associated with the use of the drug. The implications of this definition for postmarketing management of drugs are explored. In particular, postmarketing surveillance should be expanded to include the quantification of patients' values, a drug's beneficial effects, and its adverse effects. Management actions should be targeted at specific drug uses with unacceptable risks rather than at drugs themselves. This may require the use of education and service action options, as well as regulatory actions aimed at prescribers and dispensers.

摘要

本文提出了一种基于效用概念的“可接受风险”定义。如果在相关患者群体中,没有其他替代治疗方法具有比使用该药物更高的累积预期效用,那么药物特定用途的不良反应就构成可接受风险。探讨了这一定义对药物上市后管理的影响。特别是,上市后监测应扩大到包括对患者价值观、药物有益效果及其不良反应的量化。管理行动应针对具有不可接受风险的特定药物用途,而不是针对药物本身。这可能需要使用教育和服务行动选项,以及针对开处方者和配药者的监管行动。

相似文献

1
The notion of "acceptable risk": the role of utility in drug management.“可接受风险”的概念:效用在药物管理中的作用。
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):621-5. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90023-3.
2
Pharmaceutical risk management in Turkey: the first national overview.土耳其的药品风险管理:首次全国概述。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013 Dec;67(3):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
3
Analysis of safety-related regulatory actions by Japan's pharmaceutical regulatory agency.日本药品监管机构与安全相关监管行动分析。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Nov;26(11):1314-1320. doi: 10.1002/pds.4252. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
4
Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.加强和合理化欧盟的药物警戒:欧洲将走向何方?对新的欧盟药物警戒立法的审查。
Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):187-97. doi: 10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000.
5
Postmarketing surveillance of adverse reactions to drugs.药品不良反应的上市后监测。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Apr 14;288(6424):1155-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6424.1155.
6
Postmarketing surveillance of adverse reactions to drugs.药品不良反应的上市后监测。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Mar 24;288(6421):879-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6421.879.
7
New and incremental FDA black box warnings from 2008 to 2015.2008年至2015年美国食品药品监督管理局发布的新增及强化黑框警告。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018 Feb;17(2):117-123. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1415323. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
8
The rationale for a post-marketing surveillance.
Hum Reprod. 1987 Jan;2(1):41-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136486.
9
Causality assessment of adverse effects: when is re-challenge ethically acceptable?
Drug Saf. 2001;24(11):793-9. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124110-00001.
10
Are novel drugs more risky for patients than less novel drugs?新型药物对患者来说是否比非新型药物风险更高?
J Health Econ. 2004 Nov;23(6):1135-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.03.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of PKPD relationships into benefit-risk analysis.将药代动力学-药效学关系整合到获益-风险分析中。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;80(5):979-91. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12674. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
2
Benefit-risk analysis : a brief review and proposed quantitative approaches.
Drug Saf. 2003;26(12):853-62. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326120-00002.
3
Palliative medicine.姑息医学
Postgrad Med J. 1993 Jun;69(812):429-49. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.69.812.429.
4
Willingness to accept risk in the treatment of rheumatic disease.风湿性疾病治疗中接受风险的意愿。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Sep;44(3):249-52. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.3.249.