• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Willingness to accept risk in the treatment of rheumatic disease.风湿性疾病治疗中接受风险的意愿。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Sep;44(3):249-52. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.3.249.
2
High dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a study of treatment preference in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatologists.高剂量化疗与造血干细胞移植:类风湿关节炎患者及风湿病学家的治疗偏好研究
J Rheumatol. 2002 Aug;29(8):1653-8.
3
Impact of pregnancy on health related quality of life evaluated prospectively in pregnant women with rheumatic diseases by the SF-36 health survey.通过SF-36健康调查对患有风湿性疾病的孕妇的健康相关生活质量进行前瞻性评估,观察妊娠对其的影响。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Oct;64(10):1494-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.033019. Epub 2005 Mar 18.
4
Unwillingness of rheumatoid arthritis patients to risk adverse effects.类风湿性关节炎患者不愿冒不良反应的风险。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Mar;41(3):253-61. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.3.253.
5
Cost of illness in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus in Germany.德国类风湿性关节炎、强直性脊柱炎、银屑病关节炎和系统性红斑狼疮的疾病成本。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Sep;65(9):1175-83. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.046367. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
6
The risk of treatment. A study of rheumatoid arthritis patients' attitudes.治疗风险。一项关于类风湿性关节炎患者态度的研究。
Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Apr;37(4):459-60. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.4.459.
7
Effects of the Disease Characteristics and the Treatment on Psychological Status in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis.类风湿关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者的疾病特征及治疗对心理状态的影响
Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2018;14(3):271-278. doi: 10.2174/1573397113666170728123518.
8
Risk of malignancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis under immunosuppressive therapy: a single-center experience.免疫抑制治疗下类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者的恶性肿瘤风险:单中心经验。
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;11(1):31-40. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1270-0. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
9
The relationship between disease activity, quality of life, and personality types in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients.类风湿关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者的疾病活动度、生活质量与人格类型之间的关系。
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Jul;36(7):1511-1519. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3654-1. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
[Welfare as the goal of the analgesic pharmacotherapy accompanying biological treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis].[类风湿关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者生物治疗中以福利为目标的镇痛药物治疗]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2014 Nov;37(221):274-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring Patient Preferences to Inform Clinical Trial Design: An Example in Rheumatoid Arthritis.衡量患者偏好以指导临床试验设计:类风湿关节炎的一个实例
Patient. 2025 Mar;18(2):161-171. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00724-4. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Dynamics of Patient-Based Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.慢性病中基于患者的药物获益-风险评估动态:一项系统综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Sep 20;16:2609-2637. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S375062. eCollection 2022.
3
The Application of Preference Elicitation Methods in Clinical Trial Design to Quantify Trade-Offs: A Scoping Review.偏好诱导方法在量化权衡的临床试验设计中的应用:一项范围综述。
Patient. 2022 Jul;15(4):423-434. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00560-w. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
Trading Health Risks for Glory: A Reformulation of the Goldman Dilemma.为荣耀而冒健康风险:对高盛困境的重新表述。
Sports Med. 2018 Aug;48(8):1963-1969. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0881-9.
5
Applicability of patient utilities as measures of overall quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.患者效用作为类风湿关节炎临床试验中总体生活质量衡量指标的适用性。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 Feb;56(2):239-246. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew294. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
Measuring pain impact versus pain severity using a numeric rating scale.使用数字评分量表测量疼痛的影响与严重程度。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):555-60. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1926-z. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
7
Predictors of risk tolerance among oral surgery patients.口腔外科患者风险承受能力的预测因素。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Dec;68(12):2947-54. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
8
A strategy for regulatory action when new adverse effects of a licensed product emerge.当已获许可产品出现新的不良反应时的监管行动策略。
Drug Saf. 2009;32(2):91-8. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200932020-00002.
9
Benefit-risk analysis : a brief review and proposed quantitative approaches.
Drug Saf. 2003;26(12):853-62. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326120-00002.
10
Utilities measured by rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble: review and reference for health care professionals.通过评定量表、时间权衡法和标准博弈法测量的效用:给医疗保健专业人员的综述与参考
J Epidemiol. 2002 Mar;12(2):160-78. doi: 10.2188/jea.12.160.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal.用于经济评估的健康状态效用测量。
J Health Econ. 1986 Mar;5(1):1-30. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2.
2
Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer.言语与生存:喉癌患者生活质量与数量的权衡
N Engl J Med. 1981 Oct 22;305(17):982-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198110223051704.
3
The measurement of patients' values in medicine.医学中患者价值观的衡量。
Med Decis Making. 1982 Winter;2(4):449-62. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8200200407.
4
On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.关于替代疗法偏好的引出。
N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062103.
5
Perceived health: age and sex comparisons in a community.感知健康:社区中的年龄与性别比较
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984 Jun;38(2):156-60. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.2.156.
6
Preferences for health outcomes. Comparison of assessment methods.对健康结果的偏好。评估方法的比较。
Med Decis Making. 1984;4(3):315-29. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8400400307.
7
Error effects of survey questionnaires on the public's assessments of health risks.调查问卷对公众健康风险评估的误差影响。
Am J Public Health. 1986 Apr;76(4):367-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.4.367.
8
Declining trends in blood pressure level and the prevalence of hypertension, and changes in related factors in Japan, 1956-1980.1956 - 1980年日本血压水平和高血压患病率的下降趋势及相关因素的变化
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):137-47. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90065-8.
9
The notion of "acceptable risk": the role of utility in drug management.“可接受风险”的概念:效用在药物管理中的作用。
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):621-5. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90023-3.
10
Perception of risk.风险认知
Science. 1987 Apr 17;236(4799):280-5. doi: 10.1126/science.3563507.

风湿性疾病治疗中接受风险的意愿。

Willingness to accept risk in the treatment of rheumatic disease.

作者信息

O'Brien B J, Elswood J, Calin A

机构信息

Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Sep;44(3):249-52. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.3.249.

DOI:10.1136/jech.44.3.249
PMID:2273365
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1060652/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess patients willingness to accept mortal risk in the drug treatment of chronic rheumatic disease.

DESIGN

A non-random sample of consecutive patients were interviewed with a standardised survey instrument.

SETTING

The study took place in the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK.

PATIENTS

100 consecutive in- and out-patients aged 65 or less were interviewed, 50 with rheumatoid arthritis and 50 with ankylosing spondylitis. Mean age was 48 years with mean disease duration of 14 years. The rheumatoid arthritis group was mainly female (84%), v 26% in the ankylosing spondylitis group.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Risk preferences were elicited using the method of standard gamble in the context of a hypothetical new drug. Patients indicated the maximum percentage probability of mortality they regarded as acceptable to achieve four different levels of benefit: total cure (20.7%), relief of pain (16.9%), relief of stiffness (13.1%), return to normal functioning (14.5%). Rheumatoid arthritis patients displayed a higher (p less than 0.05) willingness to accept risk than ankylosing spondylitis patients for all gambles except relief of stiffness. Analysis of variance indicated that willingness to accept risk decreases with the duration of disease and increases with reductions in self assessed health status.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluative methods such as standard gamble can elicit useful risk-benefit preference data from patients to assist those who manage clinical risks.

摘要

研究目的

旨在评估慢性风湿性疾病药物治疗中患者接受死亡风险的意愿。

设计

采用标准化调查工具对连续就诊的患者进行非随机抽样访谈。

地点

研究在英国巴斯的皇家国立风湿病医院进行。

患者

对100名年龄在65岁及以下的连续门诊和住院患者进行了访谈,其中50名患有类风湿性关节炎,50名患有强直性脊柱炎。平均年龄为48岁,平均病程为14年。类风湿性关节炎组主要为女性(84%),而强直性脊柱炎组为26%。

测量与主要结果

在一种假设的新药背景下,采用标准博弈法引出风险偏好。患者指出他们认为可接受的达到四种不同受益水平的最大死亡概率百分比:完全治愈(20.7%)、疼痛缓解(16.9%)、僵硬缓解(13.1%)、恢复正常功能(14.5%)。除僵硬缓解外,在所有博弈中,类风湿性关节炎患者比强直性脊柱炎患者表现出更高的(p<0.05)接受风险意愿。方差分析表明,接受风险的意愿随疾病持续时间增加而降低,随自我评估健康状况的下降而增加。

结论

标准博弈等评估方法可以从患者中获取有用的风险-收益偏好数据,以帮助那些管理临床风险的人员。