• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

故土的绿色、金色之草:挪威高校引入开放获取。

The green, gold grass of home: Introducing open access in universities in Norway.

机构信息

TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 17;17(8):e0273091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273091. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0273091
PMID:35976952
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9385055/
Abstract

In this paper, we investigate how open access is reflected and implemented in all Norwegian universities and how they responded to national policy developments for open access in the period 2009-2021. We analyse how the universities adapted arguments for the three core missions of the universities-research, education, and societal impact-when they reacted to increasing pressures to facilitate open access. Our analysis is based on 182 institutional strategy documents, open access policies and annual reports. When considering the profile of the institutional policies and the explicit referrals to national policies, we find there is a great deal of homogeneity between Norwegian universities, and they are mostly aligned with national policy. Open access is connected to the third mission in all university strategies, but often in a very general manner and without documenting benefits for non-academic users. We find limited emphasis on open access as advantageous for education. All universities show commitment to open access, and several can be described as proactive as they tie it to different types of local incentives. Development over time suggests more mature and institutionalised polices that do not challenge what we may call the academic heartland and its core value of academic freedom, including where and how to publish. We propose a framework for analysing similar institutionalisation processes with three main dimensions: mimesis, adaptation/integration with existing practices, and maturation/commitment.

摘要

在本文中,我们调查了开放获取在挪威所有大学中的体现和实施情况,以及它们在 2009 年至 2021 年期间对国家开放获取政策发展的反应。我们分析了大学在应对促进开放获取的压力日益增加时,如何调整其对大学的三大核心使命(研究、教育和社会影响)的论证。我们的分析基于 182 份机构战略文件、开放获取政策和年度报告。在考虑机构政策的概况和对国家政策的明确提及时,我们发现挪威各大学之间存在很大的同质性,并且它们大多与国家政策保持一致。在所有大学战略中,开放获取都与第三大使命相关联,但通常以非常笼统的方式提及,并且没有记录非学术用户的收益。我们发现,开放获取对教育的好处强调有限。所有大学都表示致力于开放获取,并且有几所大学可以被描述为积极主动,因为它们将其与不同类型的本地激励措施联系起来。随着时间的推移,发展表明政策更加成熟和制度化,不会挑战我们所谓的学术核心及其学术自由的核心价值,包括在何处以及如何发表。我们提出了一个分析类似制度内化过程的框架,其中包括三个主要维度:模仿、与现有实践的适应/整合以及成熟/承诺。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a53/9385055/65ae3fa35074/pone.0273091.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a53/9385055/65ae3fa35074/pone.0273091.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a53/9385055/65ae3fa35074/pone.0273091.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The green, gold grass of home: Introducing open access in universities in Norway.故土的绿色、金色之草:挪威高校引入开放获取。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 17;17(8):e0273091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273091. eCollection 2022.
2
Global health equity in United Kingdom university research: a landscape of current policies and practices.英国大学研究中的全球卫生公平性:当前政策与实践概况
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Oct 10;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0148-6.
3
Questioning the efficacy of 'gold' open access to published articles.质疑已发表文章“黄金”开放获取的有效性。
Nurse Res. 2015 Jul;22(6):8-10. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.6.8.e1370.
4
Evaluating the impact of open access policies on research institutions.评估开放获取政策对研究机构的影响。
Elife. 2020 Sep 14;9:e57067. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57067.
5
Usage Trends of Open Access and Local Journals: A Korean Case Study.开放获取期刊与本土期刊的使用趋势:韩国案例研究
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155843. eCollection 2016.
6
Gold or green: the debate on open access policies.金本位还是绿本位:开放获取政策之争。
Int Microbiol. 2013 Sep;16(3):199-203. doi: 10.2436/20.1501.01.194.
7
[Self-archiving of biomedical papers in open access repositories].[生物医学论文在开放获取知识库中的自存档]
Rev Neurol. 2010 Apr 1;50(7):431-40.
8
Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics' OA practice.谁支持开放获取出版?与学者开放获取实践相关的性别、学科、资历及其他因素。
Scientometrics. 2017;111(2):557-579. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Trans-O-MIM-An International Research Project on Open Access Transformation: Outcomes and Lessons Learned.跨机构医学信息学国际研究项目(Trans-O-MIM):开放获取转型的成果和经验教训。
Methods Inf Med. 2023 Sep;62(3-04):140-150. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761499. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
10
Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research.开放获取出版中的作者和机构分层:全球卫生研究案例
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 19;6:e4269. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4269. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of open access policies on research institutions.评估开放获取政策对研究机构的影响。
Elife. 2020 Sep 14;9:e57067. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57067.
2
Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review.特定学科的开放获取出版实践与变革障碍:基于证据的综述
F1000Res. 2018 Dec 11;7:1925. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17328.2. eCollection 2018.
3
Predatory journals: no definition, no defence.掠夺性期刊:无定义,无辩护。
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7786):210-212. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y.
4
Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases.读者请注意!掠夺性期刊正在渗透到引文数据库中。
Int J Public Health. 2019 Nov;64(8):1123-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01284-3. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
5
No Free Lunch - What Price Plan S for Scientific Publishing?没有免费的午餐——科学出版的“计划S”代价几何?
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1181-1185. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1900864. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
The world debates open-access mandates.全球围绕开放获取授权展开辩论。
Science. 2019 Jan 4;363(6422):11-12. doi: 10.1126/science.363.6422.11.
7
Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research?当资助者强制要求研究成果开放获取时,作者会遵守规定吗?
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):483-486. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w.
8
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles.开放获取(OA)的现状:对开放获取文章的患病率和影响的大规模分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 13;6:e4375. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375. eCollection 2018.
9
The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.开放获取的学术、经济和社会影响:基于证据的综述。
F1000Res. 2016 Apr 11;5:632. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3. eCollection 2016.
10
Industry access to the literature.行业对文献的获取。
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Jul 11;29(7):571-2. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1909.