1Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
2Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2022 Aug 17;260(13):1711-1720. doi: 10.2460/javma.22.06.0242.
To assess the impact of a 15-month, in-practice communication skills intervention on client visit satisfaction.
4 purposely selected veterinary clinics, 9 veterinarians, and 930 appointment-specific client satisfaction surveys.
The study was designed as a multipractice, preintervention-postintervention study. Practice teams participated in a 15-month communication skills intervention that included interactive group workshops and one-on-one communication coaching with the entire practice. Client Satisfaction Questionnaires were completed 3 months before (mean, 55 questionnaires/veterinarian) and after (mean, 48 questionnaires/veterinarian) the intervention. The impact of the intervention and factors associated with client visit satisfaction were evaluated with mixed logistic regression.
Client satisfaction scores were dichotomized owing to extreme negative skewness. In total, 57% (284/496) of clients were completely satisfied on pretest questionnaires, and 67% (290/434) were completely satisfied on postintervention questionnaires. The odds of clients being completely satisfied were significantly higher after the communication skills intervention (OR = 1.56; P = .002). When controlling for the intervention, predictors of client visit satisfaction included appointment type (odds of being completely satisfied were significantly higher for recheck appointments than for preventative care appointments [OR = 1.71; P = .02] and health problem appointments [OR = 1.99; P = .003]) and duration of the veterinarian-client relationship (probability increased by 0.52 with each 1-year increase in relationship duration; P = .008).
Results suggested that the client-centered, skills-based communication intervention resulted in increased client visit satisfaction. Findings contribute to current evidence that client-centered communication and duration of the veterinarian-client relationship promote client satisfaction during veterinary visits.
评估为期 15 个月的实践沟通技巧干预对客户就诊满意度的影响。
4 家精选的兽医诊所、9 名兽医和 930 份特定预约客户满意度调查。
该研究设计为多实践、干预前-干预后研究。实践团队参与了为期 15 个月的沟通技巧干预,包括互动小组研讨会和对整个实践的一对一沟通辅导。在干预前(平均每位兽医 55 份问卷)和干预后(平均每位兽医 48 份问卷)的 3 个月内完成客户满意度问卷。使用混合逻辑回归评估干预的影响和与客户就诊满意度相关的因素。
由于极端负偏态,客户满意度评分被二分类。共有 57%(284/496)的客户在预测试问卷中完全满意,67%(290/434)在干预后问卷中完全满意。在沟通技巧干预后,客户完全满意的可能性显著增加(OR=1.56;P=0.002)。在控制干预的情况下,客户就诊满意度的预测因素包括预约类型(复诊预约的完全满意度显著高于预防保健预约[OR=1.71;P=0.02]和健康问题预约[OR=1.99;P=0.003])和兽医-客户关系的持续时间(关系持续时间每增加 1 年,完全满意度的概率增加 0.52;P=0.008)。
结果表明,以客户为中心、基于技能的沟通干预导致客户就诊满意度提高。研究结果为当前的证据做出了贡献,即以客户为中心的沟通和兽医-客户关系的持续时间在兽医就诊期间促进了客户满意度。