Parsons Rex, Blythe Robin D, Cramb Susanna M, McPhail Steven M
Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Gerontology. 2023;69(1):14-29. doi: 10.1159/000525727. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
The digitization of hospital systems, including integrated electronic medical records, has provided opportunities to improve the prediction performance of inpatient fall risk models and their application to computerized clinical decision support systems. This review describes the data sources and scope of methods reported in studies that developed inpatient fall prediction models, including machine learning and more traditional approaches to inpatient fall risk prediction.
This scoping review used methods recommended by the Arksey and O'Malley framework and its recent advances. PubMed, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, and EMBASE databases were systematically searched. Studies reporting the development of inpatient fall risk prediction approaches were included. There was no restriction on language or recency. Reference lists and manual searches were also completed. Reporting quality was assessed using adherence to Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis statement (TRIPOD), where appropriate.
Database searches identified 1,396 studies, 63 were included for scoping assessment and 45 for reporting quality assessment. There was considerable overlap in data sources and methods used for model development. Fall prediction models typically relied on features from patient assessments, including indicators of physical function or impairment, or cognitive function or impairment. All but two studies used patient information at or soon after admission and predicted fall risk over the entire admission, without consideration of post-admission interventions, acuity changes or length of stay. Overall, reporting quality was poor, but improved in the past decade.
There was substantial homogeneity in data sources and prediction model development methods. Use of artificial intelligence, including machine learning with high-dimensional data, remains underexplored in the context of hospital falls. Future research should consider approaches with the potential to utilize high-dimensional data from digital hospital systems, which may contribute to greater performance and clinical usefulness.
医院系统的数字化,包括集成电子病历,为提高住院患者跌倒风险模型的预测性能及其在计算机化临床决策支持系统中的应用提供了机会。本综述描述了在开发住院患者跌倒预测模型的研究中报告的数据源和方法范围,包括机器学习以及更传统的住院患者跌倒风险预测方法。
本范围综述采用了阿克西和奥马利框架及其最新进展所推荐的方法。对PubMed、CINAHL、IEEE Xplore和EMBASE数据库进行了系统检索。纳入了报告住院患者跌倒风险预测方法开发的研究。对语言或发表时间没有限制。还完成了参考文献列表检索和手工检索。在适当情况下,使用对个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型透明报告声明(TRIPOD)的遵循情况来评估报告质量。
数据库检索识别出1396项研究,63项纳入范围评估,45项纳入报告质量评估。模型开发所使用的数据源和方法有相当大的重叠。跌倒预测模型通常依赖于患者评估的特征,包括身体功能或损伤指标,或认知功能或损伤指标。除两项研究外,所有研究均使用入院时或入院后不久的患者信息,并预测整个住院期间的跌倒风险,而未考虑入院后的干预措施、病情严重程度变化或住院时间。总体而言,报告质量较差,但在过去十年有所改善。
数据源和预测模型开发方法存在很大的同质性。在医院跌倒的背景下,包括使用高维数据的机器学习在内的人工智能的应用仍未得到充分探索。未来的研究应考虑有可能利用数字医院系统中的高维数据的方法,这可能有助于提高性能和临床实用性。