Dev Preetham, Thyavihally B Yuvaraja, Waigankar Santosh Subhash, Agarwal Varun, Pednekar Abhinav P, Shah Akash
Department of Uro-Oncology, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Indian J Urol. 2022 Jul-Sep;38(3):204-209. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_349_21. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
An opportunity for e-learning has been created by the ongoing pandemic and lockdown, along with the availability of efficient technology. Webinars have filled in the lacunae of the learning process. We conducted an online survey to evaluate the interest and opinion regarding webinars, which enables for standardization of future webinars and reap the maximum benefits.
An online survey was conducted among practicing urologists and urology residents. The survey was formulated and edited by a group of urologists and uro-oncologists who had experience conducting several regional and international conferences and webinars. The survey comprised 39 questions divided into six parts.
A total of 328 urologists throughout the country participated in the survey, and 303 complete responses were obtained for the analysis. 67.3% subjects felt that live webinars are the preferred method of knowledge exchange during the coronavirus disease pandemic, and 58.1% felt that this concept of webinars had to be extended even after the pandemic was over. Few shortcomings in the webinars included lack of networking (41.3%), lack of personal connection (73.3%), and lack of practical skills (35%). About 85.5% felt that the duration should be <90 min, and 83.2% thought that speakers should be restricted to <5. They were comfortable attending the webinars on weekends (48.8%) or weekdays but after hospital hours (43.9%). Most of them felt (92.4%) that webinars should be focused, covering a single theme and including international and national speakers (84.2%).
Webinars can be streamlined for the better and continued after the pandemic. A few issues in this novel learning process have to be adequately addressed to strengthen this modality of academic urology.
持续的疫情和封锁,以及高效技术的可得性,创造了电子学习的机会。网络研讨会填补了学习过程中的空白。我们进行了一项在线调查,以评估对网络研讨会的兴趣和看法,这有助于未来网络研讨会的标准化并获取最大收益。
对执业泌尿科医生和泌尿科住院医师进行了一项在线调查。该调查由一组有举办多个地区和国际会议及网络研讨会经验的泌尿科医生和泌尿肿瘤学家制定和编辑。调查包括39个问题,分为六个部分。
全国共有328名泌尿科医生参与了调查,获得303份完整回复用于分析。67.3%的受试者认为现场网络研讨会是新冠疫情期间知识交流的首选方式,58.1%的人认为即使疫情结束后,网络研讨会的这种形式也应继续。网络研讨会的一些缺点包括缺乏社交(41.3%)、缺乏个人联系(73.3%)和缺乏实践技能(35%)。约85.5%的人认为时长应小于90分钟,83.2%的人认为演讲者应限制在5人以内。他们愿意在周末(48.8%)或工作日但下班后(43.9%)参加网络研讨会。他们中的大多数人(92.4%)认为网络研讨会应主题集中,涵盖单一主题并包括国际和国内演讲者(84.2%)。
网络研讨会可以进行优化,以便在疫情后更好地持续开展。在这个新型学习过程中的一些问题必须得到充分解决,以加强泌尿外科学术的这种模式。