Suppr超能文献

患者对等待时间和肾脏质量的偏好。

Patient Preferences for Waiting Time and Kidney Quality.

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Sep;17(9):1363-1371. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01480222. Epub 2022 Aug 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Approximately 20% of deceased donor kidneys are discarded each year in the United States. Some of these kidneys could benefit patients who are waitlisted. Understanding patient preferences regarding accepting marginal-quality kidneys could help more of the currently discarded kidneys be transplanted.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This study uses a discrete choice experiment that presents a deceased donor kidney to patients who are waiting for, or have received, a kidney transplant. The choices involve trade-offs between accepting a kidney today or a future kidney. The options were designed experimentally to quantify the relative importance of kidney quality (expected graft survival and level of kidney function) and waiting time. Choices were analyzed using a random-parameters logit model and latent-class analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 605 participants completed the discrete choice experiment. Respondents made trade-offs between kidney quality and waiting time. The average respondent would accept a kidney today, with 6.5 years of expected graft survival (95% confidence interval, 5.9 to 7.0), to avoid waiting 2 additional years for a kidney, with 11 years of expected graft survival. Three patient-preference classes were identified. Class 1 was averse to additional waiting time, but still responsive to improvements in kidney quality. Class 2 was less willing to accept increases in waiting time for improvements in kidney quality. Class 3 was willing to accept increases in waiting time even for small improvements in kidney quality. Relative to class 1, respondents in class 3 were likely to be age ≤61 years and to be waitlisted before starting dialysis, and respondents in class 2 were more likely to be older, Black, not have a college degree, and have lower Karnofsky performance status.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants preferred accepting a lower-quality kidney in return for shorter waiting time, particularly those who were older and had lower functional status.

摘要

背景与目的

在美国,每年约有 20%的已故捐赠者肾脏被废弃。其中一些肾脏可能对等待移植的患者有益。了解患者对接受边缘质量肾脏的偏好,可以帮助更多目前被丢弃的肾脏进行移植。

设计、设置、参与者和测量方法:本研究使用离散选择实验,向等待或已接受肾脏移植的患者提供已故供体的肾脏。这些选择涉及今天接受肾脏还是未来接受肾脏之间的权衡。这些选择是通过实验设计来量化肾脏质量(预期移植物存活率和肾功能水平)和等待时间的相对重要性。使用随机参数对数模型和潜在类别分析对选择进行分析。

结果

共有 605 名参与者完成了离散选择实验。受访者在肾脏质量和等待时间之间进行了权衡。平均受访者会选择今天接受一个有 6.5 年预期移植物存活率(95%置信区间,5.9 至 7.0)的肾脏,以避免再等待 2 年接受一个有 11 年预期移植物存活率的肾脏。确定了 3 种患者偏好类别。第 1 类对额外的等待时间感到反感,但仍然对改善肾脏质量有反应。第 2 类不太愿意为改善肾脏质量而接受等待时间的增加。第 3 类愿意接受等待时间的增加,即使是肾脏质量的微小改善。与第 1 类相比,第 3 类的受访者更有可能年龄≤61 岁,在开始透析前就已等待,而第 2 类的受访者更有可能年龄较大、为黑人、没有大学学历、Karnofsky 表现状态较低。

结论

参与者更愿意接受质量较低的肾脏,以换取更短的等待时间,特别是那些年龄较大且功能状态较低的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验