Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Sep;17(9):1363-1371. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01480222. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
Approximately 20% of deceased donor kidneys are discarded each year in the United States. Some of these kidneys could benefit patients who are waitlisted. Understanding patient preferences regarding accepting marginal-quality kidneys could help more of the currently discarded kidneys be transplanted.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This study uses a discrete choice experiment that presents a deceased donor kidney to patients who are waiting for, or have received, a kidney transplant. The choices involve trade-offs between accepting a kidney today or a future kidney. The options were designed experimentally to quantify the relative importance of kidney quality (expected graft survival and level of kidney function) and waiting time. Choices were analyzed using a random-parameters logit model and latent-class analysis.
In total, 605 participants completed the discrete choice experiment. Respondents made trade-offs between kidney quality and waiting time. The average respondent would accept a kidney today, with 6.5 years of expected graft survival (95% confidence interval, 5.9 to 7.0), to avoid waiting 2 additional years for a kidney, with 11 years of expected graft survival. Three patient-preference classes were identified. Class 1 was averse to additional waiting time, but still responsive to improvements in kidney quality. Class 2 was less willing to accept increases in waiting time for improvements in kidney quality. Class 3 was willing to accept increases in waiting time even for small improvements in kidney quality. Relative to class 1, respondents in class 3 were likely to be age ≤61 years and to be waitlisted before starting dialysis, and respondents in class 2 were more likely to be older, Black, not have a college degree, and have lower Karnofsky performance status.
Participants preferred accepting a lower-quality kidney in return for shorter waiting time, particularly those who were older and had lower functional status.
在美国,每年约有 20%的已故捐赠者肾脏被废弃。其中一些肾脏可能对等待移植的患者有益。了解患者对接受边缘质量肾脏的偏好,可以帮助更多目前被丢弃的肾脏进行移植。
设计、设置、参与者和测量方法:本研究使用离散选择实验,向等待或已接受肾脏移植的患者提供已故供体的肾脏。这些选择涉及今天接受肾脏还是未来接受肾脏之间的权衡。这些选择是通过实验设计来量化肾脏质量(预期移植物存活率和肾功能水平)和等待时间的相对重要性。使用随机参数对数模型和潜在类别分析对选择进行分析。
共有 605 名参与者完成了离散选择实验。受访者在肾脏质量和等待时间之间进行了权衡。平均受访者会选择今天接受一个有 6.5 年预期移植物存活率(95%置信区间,5.9 至 7.0)的肾脏,以避免再等待 2 年接受一个有 11 年预期移植物存活率的肾脏。确定了 3 种患者偏好类别。第 1 类对额外的等待时间感到反感,但仍然对改善肾脏质量有反应。第 2 类不太愿意为改善肾脏质量而接受等待时间的增加。第 3 类愿意接受等待时间的增加,即使是肾脏质量的微小改善。与第 1 类相比,第 3 类的受访者更有可能年龄≤61 岁,在开始透析前就已等待,而第 2 类的受访者更有可能年龄较大、为黑人、没有大学学历、Karnofsky 表现状态较低。
参与者更愿意接受质量较低的肾脏,以换取更短的等待时间,特别是那些年龄较大且功能状态较低的患者。