School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 19;12(8):e056182. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056182.
Multifactorial interventions, which involve assessing an individual's risk of falling and providing treatment or onward referral, require coordination across settings. Using a mixed-methods design, we aimed to develop a process map to examine onward referral pathways following falls risk assessment in primary care.
Primary care fall risk assessment clinics in the South of Ireland.
Focus groups using participatory mapping techniques with primary care staff (public health nurses (PHNs), physiotherapists (PT),and occupational therapists (OT)) were conducted to plot the processes and onward referral pathways at each clinic (n=5).
Focus groups were analysed in NVivo V.12 using inductive thematic analysis. Routine administrative data from January to March 2018 included details of client referrals, assessments and demographics sourced from referral and assessment forms. Data were analysed in Stata V.12 to estimate the number, origin and focus of onward referrals and whether older adults received follow-up interventions. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed separately and integrated to produce a map of the service.
Nine staff participated in three focus groups and one interview (PHN n=2; OT n=4; PT n=3). 85 assessments were completed at five clinics (female n=69, 81.2%, average age 77). The average number of risk factors was 5.4 out of a maximum of 10. Following assessment, clients received an average of three onward referrals. Only one-third of referrals (n=135/201, 33%) had data available on intervention receipt. Primary care staff identified variations in how formally onward referrals were managed and barriers, including a lack of client information, inappropriate referral and a lack of data management support.
Challenges to onward referral manifest early in an integrated care pathway, such as clients with multiple risk factors sent for initial assessment and the lack of an integrated IT system to share information across settings.
多因素干预措施涉及评估个体跌倒风险并提供治疗或进一步转诊,需要在不同环境之间进行协调。本研究采用混合方法设计,旨在制定流程图以检查爱尔兰南部初级保健中跌倒风险评估后的转诊途径。
初级保健跌倒风险评估诊所。
使用参与式绘图技术对初级保健工作人员(公共卫生护士 (PHN)、物理治疗师 (PT) 和职业治疗师 (OT))进行焦点小组讨论,以绘制每个诊所的流程和转诊途径(n=5)。
使用 NVivo V.12 对焦点小组进行分析,采用归纳主题分析。2018 年 1 月至 3 月的常规行政数据包括转诊和评估表格中来源的客户转诊、评估和人口统计详细信息。在 Stata V.12 中分析数据,以估计转诊的数量、来源和重点,以及老年人是否接受了后续干预。对定量和定性数据分别进行分析,并将其整合以生成服务地图。
9 名工作人员参加了 3 个焦点小组和 1 次访谈(PHN n=2;OT n=4;PT n=3)。在五个诊所完成了 85 次评估(女性 n=69,81.2%,平均年龄 77)。最大风险因素为 10 个,平均有 5.4 个。评估后,患者平均接受了 3 次转诊。只有三分之一的转诊(n=135/201,33%)有关于干预措施的可获得数据。初级保健工作人员确定了正式转诊管理和障碍的变化,包括缺乏客户信息、不适当的转诊和缺乏数据管理支持。
在综合护理途径中,早期就存在向转诊的挑战,例如有多个风险因素的患者接受初始评估以及缺乏集成的 IT 系统来跨环境共享信息。