Varela-Mato Veronica, Godfree Kate, Adem Anwar, Blake Holly, Bartle Craig, Daly Guy, Hassard Juliet, Kneller Richard, Meyer Caroline, Russell Sean, Marwaha Steven, Kershaw Charlotte, Newman Kristina, Yarker Joanna, Thomson Louise, Munir Fehmidah
School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Aug 19;8(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01143-8.
The cost of sickness absence has major social, psychological and financial implications for individuals and organisations. Return-to-work (RTW) interventions that support good quality communication and contact with the workplace can reduce the length of sickness absence by between 15 and 30 days. However, initiatives promoting a sustainable return to work for workers with poor mental health on long-term sickness absence across small, medium and large enterprises (SMEs and LEs) are limited. This paper describes the protocol of a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the feasibility of implementing a RTW intervention across SMEs and LEs across all sectors.
A two-arm feasibility RCT with a 4-month intervention will be conducted in SMEs and LE enterprises from the Midlands region, UK. At least 8 organisations (4 controls and interventions), and at least 60 workers and/or managers, will be recruited and randomised into the intervention and control group (30 interventions, 30 controls). Workers on long-term sickness absence (LTSA) (between 8 and 50 days) and managers with a worker on LTSA will be eligible to participate. The intervention is a behavioural change programme, including a managers and workers RTW toolkit, focused on supporting sickness absence and RTW through the provision of knowledge, problem-solving, action planning, goal setting and positive communication that leads to a sustainable RTW. Organisations assigned to the control group will continue with their usual practice. Measurements of mental health, RTW, work outcomes, quality-of-life, workplace support and communication and other demographic data will be taken at baseline, 2 months and 4 months. Feasibility will be assessed based on recruitment, retention, attrition, completion of measures and intervention compliance for which specific process and research outcomes have been established. A process evaluation will explore the experiences and acceptability of the intervention components and evaluation measures. Exploratory economic evaluation will be conducted to further inform a definitive trial.
This is a novel intervention using a worker-manager approach to promote a sustainable return to work of workers on long-term sick leave due to poor mental wellbeing. If this intervention is shown to be feasible, the outcomes will inform a larger scale randomised control trial.
ISRCTN90032009 (retrospectively registered, date registered 15th December 2020).
病假成本对个人和组织具有重大的社会、心理和经济影响。支持与工作场所进行高质量沟通和联系的重返工作岗位(RTW)干预措施可将病假时长缩短15至30天。然而,针对长期病假的心理健康状况不佳的员工,在中小企业和大型企业(SMEs和LEs)中促进其可持续重返工作岗位的举措有限。本文描述了一项试点随机对照试验(RCT)的方案,以测试在所有部门的中小企业和大型企业中实施RTW干预措施的可行性。
一项为期4个月干预的双臂可行性随机对照试验将在英国中部地区的中小企业和大型企业中进行。至少招募8个组织(4个对照组和干预组),以及至少60名员工和/或管理人员,并将其随机分为干预组和对照组(30个干预组,30个对照组)。长期病假(LTSA)(8至50天)的员工以及有长期病假员工的管理人员将有资格参与。干预措施是一个行为改变计划,包括一个针对管理人员和员工的RTW工具包,通过提供知识、解决问题、行动计划、目标设定和积极沟通来支持病假和重返工作岗位,从而实现可持续的重返工作。分配到对照组的组织将继续其常规做法。将在基线、2个月和4个月时对心理健康、重返工作岗位、工作成果、生活质量、工作场所支持与沟通以及其他人口统计学数据进行测量。将根据招募、留存、损耗、测量完成情况和干预依从性来评估可行性,为此已确定了具体的过程和研究结果。将进行过程评估,以探索干预措施组成部分和评估措施的经验及可接受性。将进行探索性经济评估,以为确定性试验提供进一步信息。
这是一种新颖的干预措施,采用员工-管理人员方法来促进因心理健康不佳而长期病假的员工可持续重返工作岗位。如果该干预措施被证明是可行的,其结果将为更大规模的随机对照试验提供参考。
ISRCTN90032009(追溯注册,注册日期为2020年12月15日)。