• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在围绕网片使用的负面宣传时代,压力性尿失禁的咨询:一项大样本全球调查的结果

Counseling for stress urinary incontinence in the era of adverse publicity around mesh usage: Results from a large-sample global survey.

作者信息

Zilberlicht Ariel, Karmakar Debjyoti, Dwyer Peter L, Chan Garson, Schierlitz Lore

机构信息

Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Technion University, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel.

Department of Urogynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;160(2):579-587. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14418. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1002/ijgo.14418
PMID:35986609
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate doctors' opinions of the use of synthetic mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and the effect on patient's attitude following recent adverse publicity and legal findings.

METHODS

Electronic survey approved by International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS), distributed to their members.

RESULTS

A total of 593 respondents completed the survey. The preferred initial surgical treatment for SUI was retropubic midurethral sling (MUS) (62%), followed by trans-obturator MUS (19%), mini-slings (10%), and then bulking agents (5%). Despite prolongation of consultation, most respondents (87%) believed that clinicians should provide a patient information leaflet (PIL) for their patients. However, only 70% of respondents were doing this. Most participants would use either the IUGA PIL or their institution PIL (61%). Only 8% felt that patients have a positive preconception of synthetic mesh for SUI. Eighty-three per cent of respondents had not changed their recommendations for treatment and the consent process. A logistic regression model identified preferences of certain geographic areas as predictors of consenting practices.

CONCLUSION

Despite the negative publicity and the current medicolegal litigation involving MUS for SUI treatment, the majority of respondents still prefer this as the initial surgical treatment. Most clinicians value PIL in the surgical consent process.

摘要

目的

调查医生对于使用合成网片治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)的看法,以及近期负面宣传和法律调查结果对患者态度的影响。

方法

经国际尿控协会(IUGA)和美国妇科泌尿学会(AUGS)批准的电子调查问卷,分发给其成员。

结果

共有593名受访者完成了调查。SUI首选的初始手术治疗方法是耻骨后中段尿道吊带术(MUS)(62%),其次是经闭孔MUS(19%)、微型吊带(10%),然后是填充剂(5%)。尽管咨询时间延长,但大多数受访者(87%)认为临床医生应为患者提供患者信息手册(PIL)。然而,只有70%的受访者这样做了。大多数参与者会使用IUGA的PIL或其所在机构的PIL(61%)。只有8%的人认为患者对用于SUI的合成网片有积极的先入之见。83%的受访者没有改变他们的治疗建议和同意程序。逻辑回归模型确定某些地理区域的偏好是同意做法的预测因素。

结论

尽管有负面宣传以及目前涉及用于SUI治疗的MUS的医疗法律诉讼,但大多数受访者仍然更喜欢将其作为初始手术治疗方法。大多数临床医生重视手术同意过程中的PIL。

相似文献

1
Counseling for stress urinary incontinence in the era of adverse publicity around mesh usage: Results from a large-sample global survey.在围绕网片使用的负面宣传时代,压力性尿失禁的咨询:一项大样本全球调查的结果
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;160(2):579-587. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14418. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).经阴道无张力尿道中段吊带术失败后复发性压力性尿失禁的管理:国际尿控协会(IUGA)成员的一项调查
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Sep;26(9):1285-91. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2696-7. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
3
Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.压力性尿失禁女性的外科治疗:ESTER系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(14):1-306. doi: 10.3310/hta23140.
4
Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice patterns: IUGA member survey.女性盆腔医学与重建外科的实践模式:国际尿控学会会员调查
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Oct;26(10):1489-94. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2734-5. Epub 2015 May 28.
5
The Evolving Story of Mesh Mid Urethral Slings: The Surgeon's Perspective.
J Urol. 2022 Feb;207(2):407-416. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002203. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
6
Midurethral slings for treatment of stress urinary incontinence review.经阴道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的研究综述。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Aug;38 Suppl 4:S70-S75. doi: 10.1002/nau.24030. Epub 2019 May 26.
7
Comparing risk of repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence after mid-urethral slings and polyacrylamide hydrogel.比较经尿道中段吊带术和聚丙烯酰胺水凝胶术后压力性尿失禁再次手术的风险。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Dec;100(12):2186-2192. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14271. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
8
Would Surgeons Opt for Polypropylene Mesh if They Hypothetically Had Stress Urinary Incontinence or Pelvic Organ Prolapse?如果外科医生患有压力性尿失禁或盆腔器官脱垂,他们会选择聚丙烯网片吗?
Urol Pract. 2022 Jul;9(4):306-313. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000307. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
9
A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling.一项比较单切口吊带与耻骨后中段尿道吊带的队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):351-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2208-6. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
10
[Questionnaire survey on the application of polypropylene mesh and sling in pelvic floor reconstruction surgery in Chinese IUGA members].[针对中国国际尿控学会成员在盆底重建手术中应用聚丙烯网片和吊带的问卷调查]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 25;54(9):608-614. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.09.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Mesh-associated pain syndrome: predictors for continence and prolapse mesh removal surgery in a single centre.网片相关疼痛综合征:单中心研究中对控尿和脱垂网片取出手术的预测因子。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03393-5.
2
Current Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence by Bulking Agents and Laser Therapy-An Update.填充剂和激光疗法治疗压力性尿失禁的现状——最新进展
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 28;13(5):1377. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051377.