Department of Social Medicine, UNC-Chapel Hill.
Med Anthropol Q. 2022 Dec;36(4):534-551. doi: 10.1111/maq.12720. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
Physicians who participate in abortion and medically assisted death in the United States work at the margins of institutionalized medicine. What motivates them to engage in such "dirty work"? This article uses ethnographic materials from two recent projects to analyze physicians' roles as gatekeepers to contested medical services. Abortion and medically assisted death share many similarities: They are both deeply stigmatized practices that are heavily restricted in many U.S. jurisdictions, and which many physicians are reluctant to participate in for moral, religious, or professional reasons. They both also confer medicine with the power to govern life and death decisions through the apparatus of state law. However, state laws operate quite differently on physicians in these two cases, with different outcomes. This comparative analysis demonstrates how dirty work in medicine enrolls the agency and subjectivity of physicians in distinctive ways that may be eclipsed by totalizing biopolitical frameworks. [abortion, medical aid in dying, physicians, agency, biopolitics, United States].
美国参与堕胎和医疗辅助死亡的医生在制度化医疗的边缘工作。是什么促使他们从事这种“肮脏的工作”?本文使用最近两个项目的民族志材料,分析了医生作为有争议医疗服务守门人的角色。堕胎和医疗辅助死亡有许多相似之处:它们都是受到严重污名化的做法,在美国许多司法管辖区受到严格限制,许多医生出于道德、宗教或职业原因不愿参与其中。它们都通过州法律的机构赋予了医学管理生命和死亡决策的权力。然而,在这两种情况下,州法律对医生的规定大不相同,结果也不同。这种比较分析表明,医学中的肮脏工作以独特的方式使医生的能动性和主体性参与其中,这可能被包罗万象的生物政治框架所掩盖。[堕胎、医疗辅助死亡、医生、能动性、生物政治、美国]。