• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳房硅胶囊假体中纤维囊磁共振分类建议。

Magnetic resonance classification proposal for fibrous capsules in breast silicone implants.

机构信息

Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo (FCMSCSP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Femme Laboratório da Mulher, São Paulo/ Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Imaging. 2022 Nov;91:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.08.010
PMID:35986974
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To propose a new classification system for evaluating fibrous capsules around silicone implants using magnetic resonance.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 90 consecutive patients who underwent breast MRI scans at a single center from February to March 2022. All patients with silicone implants and contrast dynamic sequences were included. Two radiologists classified the fibrous capsules according to the proposed classification in four grades. Interobserver variability was calculated for the final score. For comparison purposes, the inter-rater agreement of background parenchymal enhancement and the amount of fibroglandular tissue were also calculated.

RESULTS

Reader 1 classified 2 (2.2) fibrous capsules as grade 1, 7 (7.8) as grade 2, 18 (20.0) as grade 3, and 63 (70.0) as grade 4, whereas reader 2 classified 1 (1.1), 9 (10.0), 24 (26.7), and 56 (62.2) fibrous capsules, respectively, for each grade. The interobserver agreement for fibrous capsule classification was moderate (ĸ = 0.65). The inter-rater agreement of background parenchymal enhancement and amount of fibroglandular tissue were fair: ĸ = 0.50 and ĸ = 0.44, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study proposes classifying FC by MRI in patients with SI to standardize the description and classification of the findings with good interobserver agreement.

摘要

目的

提出一种新的磁共振成像评估硅酮植入物周围纤维囊的分类系统。

方法

我们回顾性评估了 2022 年 2 月至 3 月在一家中心接受乳房 MRI 扫描的 90 例连续患者。所有患者均为硅酮植入物和对比动态序列。两位放射科医生根据提出的分类方案将纤维囊分为四个等级。计算最终评分的观察者间变异性。为了比较目的,还计算了背景实质强化和纤维腺体组织量的组内相关系数。

结果

读者 1 将 2(2.2)个纤维囊分为 1 级,7(7.8)个为 2 级,18(20.0)个为 3 级,63(70.0)个为 4 级,而读者 2 将 1(1.1)个、9(10.0)个、24(26.7)个和 56(62.2)个纤维囊分别分为每个等级。纤维囊分类的观察者间一致性为中度(ĸ=0.65)。背景实质强化和纤维腺体组织量的组内相关系数为公平:ĸ=0.50 和 ĸ=0.44。

结论

我们的研究提出了一种通过 MRI 对 SI 患者的 FC 进行分类的方法,以标准化发现的描述和分类,具有良好的观察者间一致性。

相似文献

1
Magnetic resonance classification proposal for fibrous capsules in breast silicone implants.乳房硅胶囊假体中纤维囊磁共振分类建议。
Clin Imaging. 2022 Nov;91:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
Tumor remnant after silicone implant en bloc capsulectomy: The magnetic resonance role.硅酮植入物整块囊切除术的肿瘤残留:磁共振的作用。
Clin Anat. 2022 Jul;35(5):679-681. doi: 10.1002/ca.23891. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
Silicone implant and fibrous capsule assessment based on water-fat-silicone chemical shift encoding-based species separation in breast MRI.基于水脂硅化学位移编码物质分离的乳腺 MRI 中硅酮植入物和纤维囊评估。
Acta Radiol. 2024 Jul;65(7):716-723. doi: 10.1177/02841851241258402. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
4
Why Is the Baker Classification Inadequate for Classifying Silicone Implant Fibrous Capsules?为什么贝克分类法不足以对硅胶植入物纤维包膜进行分类?
Cureus. 2024 Mar 8;16(3):e55776. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55776. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Silicone particles in capsules around breast implants: Establishment of a new pathological methodology to assess the number of particles around breast implants.隆胸植入物周围胶囊中的硅颗粒:建立一种新的病理学方法来评估隆胸植入物周围的颗粒数量。
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2023 Jan;68(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
MR imaging of silicone breast implants: evaluation of prospective and retrospective interpretations and interobserver agreement.硅凝胶乳房植入物的磁共振成像:前瞻性与回顾性解读及观察者间一致性评估
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996 Jan-Feb;6(1):213-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880060137.
7
MRI screening for silicone breast implant rupture: accuracy, inter- and intraobserver variability using explantation results as reference standard.MRI 筛查硅酮乳房植入物破裂:以假体取出结果作为参考标准的准确性、观察者间和观察者内变异性。
Eur Radiol. 2014 Jun;24(6):1167-75. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3119-8. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
Silicon and silicone levels in patients with silicone implants.硅胶植入患者体内的硅和硅胶水平。
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1996;210:39-48. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-85226-8_4.
9
Untreated silicone breast implant rupture.未经治疗的硅胶乳房植入物破裂。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jul;114(1):204-14; discussion 215-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000128821.87939.b5.
10
[Histological and immunohistochemical investigations with capsular contracture after breast augmentation with smooth silicone gel implants].[光滑硅胶乳房植入物隆乳术后包膜挛缩的组织学和免疫组化研究]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2006 Aug;38(4):224-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924420.

引用本文的文献

1
Dedicated Ultrasonography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Implant Evaluation, Initial Study.专用超声检查与磁共振成像用于乳房植入物评估的初步研究
Med Devices (Auckl). 2025 Mar 14;18:177-189. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S503466. eCollection 2025.
2
Why Is the Baker Classification Inadequate for Classifying Silicone Implant Fibrous Capsules?为什么贝克分类法不足以对硅胶植入物纤维包膜进行分类?
Cureus. 2024 Mar 8;16(3):e55776. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55776. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Breast silicone implants' pericapsular impairment: current underdiagnosed status.
乳房硅胶植入物的包膜周围损伤:当前诊断不足的现状。
Front Surg. 2023 Sep 12;10:1249078. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1249078. eCollection 2023.