• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

指定定性研究饱和度的十个步骤。

Ten steps for specifying saturation in qualitative research.

机构信息

Griffith University, 4222, Australia.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;309:115217. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115217. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115217
PMID:35987160
Abstract

Saturation is critical to reliability of qualitative social sciences, but methods descriptions differ greatly in the degree of detail provided. Rigour could be improved by routinely following a ten-step methodological protocol. 1. Define the underlying disciplinary framework. 2. Specify the target class precisely. 3. Show how participants or cases were selected or excluded. 4. Describe techniques to minimise inadvertent or indirect selection bias. 5. Report homogeneity or heterogeneity of cases, relative to the focus of analysis. 6. Report processes for elicitation or extraction of information content. 7. Select code, meaning or model saturation. 8. Specify code and concept fineness or granularity. 9. Report order and randomisation of cases. 10. Define the level of precision in post facto tests of saturation.

摘要

饱和度对定性社会科学的可靠性至关重要,但方法描述在提供的详细程度上差异很大。通过例行遵循十步方法论方案,可以提高严谨性。1. 定义基础学科框架。2. 精确指定目标类别。3. 展示参与者或案例是如何被选择或排除的。4. 描述最小化无意或间接选择偏差的技术。5. 报告相对于分析重点的案例的同质性或异质性。6. 报告启发或提取信息内容的过程。7. 选择代码、含义或模型饱和度。8. 指定代码和概念的细度或粒度。9. 报告案例的顺序和随机化。10. 定义事后测试饱和度的精度水平。

相似文献

1
Ten steps for specifying saturation in qualitative research.指定定性研究饱和度的十个步骤。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;309:115217. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115217. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research.一种评估和报告定性研究主题饱和度的简单方法。
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. eCollection 2020.
3
Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development.在定性研究数据的主题分析中尝试严谨性和可重复性;以代码本开发为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?代码饱和度与意义饱和度:多少次访谈才算足够?
Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):591-608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
6
Finding a method to analyze qualitative data: using a study of conceptual learning.寻找一种分析定性数据的方法:以一项概念学习研究为例
J Dent Educ. 2009 Jan;73(1):53-64.
7
[Sampling in qualitative research: a proposal for procedures to detect theoretical saturation].[质性研究中的抽样:关于检测理论饱和度程序的建议]
Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Feb;27(2):388-94. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011000200020.
8
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
9
What Influences Saturation? Estimating Sample Sizes in Focus Group Research.哪些因素会影响饱和度?焦点小组研究中的样本量估计。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(10):1483-1496. doi: 10.1177/1049732318821692. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
10
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Parenting and stimulation for child development at home: perspectives from Nurturing Care.家庭中促进儿童发展的养育与刺激:来自关爱照护的视角
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2025 Aug 18;33:e4611. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7554.4611. eCollection 2025.
2
The needs for medical visit accompaniment services among older patients with chronic diseases and their family members: a qualitative study.老年慢性病患者及其家庭成员对就医陪同服务的需求:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 9;13:1577329. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1577329. eCollection 2025.
3
Why I'm not Working: People with Vision Impairments Explain.
我为何不工作:视力障碍者的解释。
J Vocat Rehabil. 2024;61(1):39-53. doi: 10.3233/jvr-240018.