Vitkus J, Horowitz L M
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jun;52(6):1266-73. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1266.
A substantial literature has shown that lonely people differ from nonlonely people on a variety of measures of social performance. These differences have usually been conceptualized as a social skills deficit, which implies that lonely people lack the ability to perform appropriate and effective social behavior. Rather than a lack of this ability, the authors hypothesize that the adoption of passive interpersonal roles predisposes lonely people to exhibit inadequate performance. In order to test this hypothesis, lonely and nonlonely subjects were assigned to one of two roles: They either listened (Condition Li) to an interaction partner describe a personal problem or they themselves described a personal problem (Condition Pr) to their partner. The subjects' interpersonal role produced a substantial effect on their social behavior. Subjects who listened to their partner describe a problem generated more solutions to a set of hypothetical situations, attended to their partners more adequately, and conversed longer than did subjects who described a personal problem. In contrast, lonely subjects did not differ from nonlonely subjects in their social performance within each particular role. Lonely and nonlonely subjects did differ, however, in their subjective evaluations of themselves and of their performance. These results illustrate the need for research to address both the interpersonal and the intrapersonal bases of social performance.
大量文献表明,孤独的人与不孤独的人在各种社交表现指标上存在差异。这些差异通常被概念化为社交技能缺陷,这意味着孤独的人缺乏表现适当和有效社交行为的能力。作者们提出假设,与缺乏这种能力不同,采用被动的人际角色使孤独的人容易表现出不充分的表现。为了验证这一假设,将孤独的和不孤独的受试者分配到两种角色之一:他们要么倾听(倾听条件)互动伙伴描述个人问题,要么自己向伙伴描述个人问题(描述条件)。受试者的人际角色对他们的社交行为产生了重大影响。倾听伙伴描述问题的受试者针对一组假设情境提出了更多解决方案,更充分地关注伙伴,并且交谈时间比描述个人问题的受试者更长。相比之下,在每个特定角色中,孤独的受试者与不孤独的受试者在社交表现上没有差异。然而,孤独的和不孤独的受试者在对自己及其表现的主观评价上确实存在差异。这些结果表明,研究需要解决社交表现的人际和个人内在基础。