Huang Jiapeng, Fan Ye, Zhao Kehong, Yang Chunlan, Zhao Ziqi, Chen Yin, Yang Jiaen, Wang Tingting, Qu Yun
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Research Laboratory of Neurorehabilitation, Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou , Guangdong, China.
Neuromodulation. 2023 Dec;26(8):1535-1548. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative efficacy of neuromodulation technologies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults.
A computerized search was conducted of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, CNKI, Wan Fang Data, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to April 21, 2022.
The search selected clinical trials with random allocation to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS), vaginal electrical stimulation (VES), sacral neuromodulation (SNM), parasacral stimulation (PS), pudendal neuromodulation, or placebo.
The main outcomes were the voiding diary, OAB-related quality of life, and positive response rate. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias of each included study, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool was used to evaluate the overall evidence quality of key outcomes.
The study included 21 randomized controlled trials involving 1433 participants, and all trials were used for the meta-analysis. In the network meta-analyses, five of six neuromodulation technologies, including PTNS, TTNS, VES, SNM, and PS, were related to higher efficacy than the placebo. Ranking probability showed that SNM was the most efficacious therapy for improving OAB-related quality of life, urinary episodes, and urinary frequency. For urgency incontinence episodes and the number of pads, PTNS and TTNS were the most efficacious modalities, respectively.
Neuromodulation technologies, including PTNS, TTNS, VES, SNM, and PS, may be effective and safe solutions for OAB syndrome in adults. Moreover, SNM is the most efficacious regimen for OAB-related quality of life, urinary episodes, and urinary frequency. PTNS and TTNS are the most efficacious modalities for reducing urgency incontinence episodes and the number of pads, respectively. Future studies should pay more attention to the quality of study design and report, patients who may benefit the most from neuromodulation, and the long-term effect, cost-effectiveness, and satisfaction of neuromodulation.
本研究旨在探讨神经调节技术对成人膀胱过度活动症(OAB)综合征的相对疗效。
截至2022年4月21日,对Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、科学网、中国知网、万方数据和ClinicalTrials.gov进行了计算机检索。
检索选择了随机分配至经皮胫神经刺激(PTNS)、经皮胫神经刺激(TTNS)、阴道电刺激(VES)、骶神经调节(SNM)、骶旁刺激(PS)、阴部神经调节或安慰剂的临床试验。
主要结局为排尿日记、与OAB相关的生活质量及阳性反应率。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2.0)评估每项纳入研究的偏倚风险,采用推荐分级评估、制定和评价工具评估关键结局的总体证据质量。
该研究纳入了21项随机对照试验,涉及1433名参与者,所有试验均用于荟萃分析。在网状荟萃分析中,包括PTNS、TTNS、VES、SNM和PS在内的六种神经调节技术中有五种与比安慰剂更高的疗效相关。排序概率显示,SNM是改善与OAB相关的生活质量、排尿次数和尿频的最有效疗法。对于急迫性尿失禁发作次数和护垫使用数量,PTNS和TTNS分别是最有效的治疗方式。
包括PTNS、TTNS、VES、SNM和PS在内的神经调节技术可能是成人OAB综合征有效且安全的解决方案。此外,SNM是改善与OAB相关的生活质量、排尿次数和尿频的最有效方案。PTNS和TTNS分别是减少急迫性尿失禁发作次数和护垫使用数量的最有效治疗方式。未来的研究应更多关注研究设计和报告的质量、可能从神经调节中获益最大的患者,以及神经调节的长期效果(疗效)、成本效益和满意度。