Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University Chair for Medical Education Research and Development, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):2191-2203. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2105390.
Medical professionalism reflects the commitment of physicians to their patients, society, themselves, and the profession. The study examined residents' attitudes towards professionalism and how these attitudes vary among the different demographic groups, namely gender, specialty, and year of residency.
A proportionate random sampling strategy was used to select the study sample. Medical residents from six specialties at a large tertiary care teaching facility were invited to participate in an online survey. The survey used the modified Learners Attitude of Medical Professionalism Scale (LAMPS), which consists of five domains: respect, excellence, altruism, duty/accountability, and integrity. Chi-square, Student t-test, one-way ANOVA, factorial ANOVA, and post hoc analysis were used to examine the attitudinal differences towards professionalism among the different demographic factors.
The overall response rate was 82.7%. Overall, the residents' self-reported attitudes towards professionalism was positive. The highest score was for the "respect" domain (4.61), and the lowest was for "altruism" (3.67). No significant association was found between the mean scores and the three studied variables, namely, gender, specialty (surgical/nonsurgical), and level (senior/junior).
No significant differences were observed in the overall attitude towards professionalism among the residents regarding their year of residency, gender, and specialty. The low altruism score and absence of improvement of the total score regarding the residents' increasing experience in the profession are concerns that need remedial action. Therefore, we suggest that future research look for possible explanations by using multi-institutional surveys that explore not only the residents' attitudes, but also the trainers' attitudes and practice, work situations, the hidden curriculum, and culture. Key messagesAttitudes towards professionalism among different demographic groups of residents do not show similar variations as has been reported in the literature, albeit in different sociocultural contexts.The low altruism score and absence of improvement of the total score as the residents gained more experience in the profession are concerns that need remedial action.A longitudinal study involving more than one institution for both residents and their faculty members to compare faculty scores with those of residents, while controlling for specialty and gender, may help elucidate the factors affecting attitudes towards professionalism and suggest possible means of addressing unfavourable attitudes.
医学专业精神反映了医生对患者、社会、自身和职业的承诺。本研究考察了住院医师对专业精神的态度,以及这些态度在不同人口统计学群体(即性别、专业和住院年限)中的差异。
采用比例随机抽样策略选择研究样本。邀请来自一家大型三级保健教学机构的六个专业的住院医师参加在线调查。该调查使用了改良的学习者医学专业精神态度量表(LAMPS),该量表由五个领域组成:尊重、卓越、利他主义、责任/问责制和正直。采用卡方检验、学生 t 检验、单因素方差分析、析因方差分析和事后分析,考察不同人口统计学因素对专业精神态度的差异。
总的回复率为 82.7%。总体而言,住院医师对专业精神的自我报告态度是积极的。得分最高的是“尊重”领域(4.61),得分最低的是“利他主义”领域(3.67)。在研究的三个变量(性别、专业(外科/非外科)和级别(高级/初级))中,平均得分与这三个变量之间没有显著关联。
在住院医师的住院年限、性别和专业方面,他们对专业精神的总体态度没有显著差异。利他主义得分较低,以及随着住院医师在该专业经验的增加,总分没有提高,这是需要采取补救措施的问题。因此,我们建议未来的研究通过使用多机构调查来寻找可能的解释,这些调查不仅要探索住院医师的态度,还要探索培训师的态度和实践、工作情况、隐性课程和文化。
不同人口统计学群体的住院医师对专业精神的态度与文献报道的情况没有相似的变化,尽管所处的社会文化背景不同。
利他主义得分较低,以及随着住院医师在该专业经验的增加,总分没有提高,这是需要采取补救措施的问题。
一项涉及多个机构的住院医师及其教师的纵向研究,比较教师和住院医师的分数,同时控制专业和性别因素,可能有助于阐明影响专业精神态度的因素,并提出解决不利态度的可能方法。