The Eye Consultant Clinic, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, P.O. Box 7191, Riyadh, 11462, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 19;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02071-y.
Professionalism is hard to quantify but essential in medical practice. We present a survey tool for ophthalmologists that assessed professionalism using case-based scenarios in central Saudi Arabia.
Ophthalmologists (resident, fellows and consultants) participated in a web-based survey in 2015. Out of 44 attributes related to professionalism, experts selected 32 attributes with validity indices of ≥0.80. To evaluate these attributes, 51 scenario-based questions were developed and included in the survey. For each attribute, participants were given choices of close ended responses: unacceptable (1), probably unacceptable (2), acceptable (3), probably acceptable (4). The attribute score was compared to the gold standard (responses of an expert group). An attribute score was generated and compared among subgroups.
Of the 155 ophthalmologists, responses of 147 ophthalmologists who completed more than 50% of questions were reviewed. Their mean attribute score was 84.1 ± 10.1 (Median 87.1; 25% quartile 78.1; minimum 50; and maximum 100). The variation in attribute score among consultants, fellows and resident ophthalmologists was significant (P = 0.008). The variation of attribute score by groups of attributes was also significant (P < 0.05). The score for 'Personal characteristics' was on a lower scale compared to that of other attribute groups. The variation in the scores for attribute groups; 'Personal characteristics attribute' group (p < 0.01) and 'Workplace practices & relationship' group (P = 0.03) for consultants, fellows and residents were significant.
Professionalism among ophthalmologists and those in training was high and influenced by years of experience. The survey tool appeared to show differences in responses to specific professional attribute groups between trainees and consultants. Additional studies with a larger sample size might be helpful in validating the survey as a tool to be used to assess professionalism in graduate medical education in ophthalmology.
专业精神难以量化,但在医疗实践中至关重要。我们提出了一种用于眼科医生的评估工具,该工具使用沙特中部的基于案例的场景来评估专业精神。
2015 年,眼科医生(住院医师、研究员和顾问)参与了一项基于网络的调查。在与专业精神相关的 44 个属性中,专家选择了 32 个有效性指数≥0.80 的属性。为了评估这些属性,开发了 51 个基于场景的问题,并将其纳入调查。对于每个属性,参与者都有封闭答案的选择:不可接受(1)、可能不可接受(2)、可接受(3)、可能可接受(4)。将属性得分与黄金标准(专家组的回答)进行比较。生成属性得分并在亚组之间进行比较。
在 155 名眼科医生中,对完成超过 50%问题的 147 名眼科医生的回复进行了审查。他们的平均属性得分是 84.1±10.1(中位数 87.1;25%四分位数 78.1;最低 50;最高 100)。顾问、研究员和住院医师的属性得分差异显著(P=0.008)。属性得分按属性组划分的差异也具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与其他属性组相比,“个人特征”属性组的得分较低。顾问、研究员和住院医师的“个人特征”属性组(P<0.01)和“工作场所实践和关系”属性组(P=0.03)的得分差异具有统计学意义。
眼科医生和培训生的专业精神水平较高,并且受到工作经验的影响。该调查工具似乎表明,受训者和顾问对特定专业属性组的反应存在差异。进一步的研究,样本量更大,可能有助于验证该调查作为评估眼科住院医师医学教育中专业精神的工具。