Awan Shakeel A, Khawaja Imran, Babar Muhammad, Khan Faheem
Department of Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Burton, GBR.
Department of Internal Medicine, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, PAK.
Cureus. 2022 Jul 20;14(7):e27072. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27072. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Background Epilepsy is considered when a patient has at least two unprovoked seizures that occurred more than a day apart. Seizure control depends upon several factors, including adequate treatment and its dosage, patients' daily activities, and adherence to antiepileptic medications. The study aimed to assess the rate of adherence to antiepileptic drugs (AED) in patients with epilepsy. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Neurology, Ayub Teaching Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan, between November 2019 and October 2020. All participants who presented to the emergency room with complaints of seizures, had a known diagnosis of epilepsy, aged above 18 years, with no cognitive dysfunction or severe psychiatric disorders were included in the study. Patients with other neurological disabilities (brain tumors, cerebral palsy, neuromuscular disorder) or severe psychotic episodes and those with undiagnosed cases of epilepsy were excluded from the study. A predefined proforma was used to assess the level of adherence and non-adherence among patients and they were then divided into their respective groups. Results A total of 150 participants were included in the study. Of patients, 110 were adherent to AED treatment while 40 were non-compliant. It was found that the most frequent cause of non-adherence was that patients forgot their pills (72.5%). Of patients, 7.5% stopped taking the medication when symptoms were relieved. About 12.5% reported affordability to be the reason for non-adherence. The rate of poor seizure control was significantly higher in non-adherent patients as compared to adherent patients (77.5% vs. 49.1%, p = 0.001). It was also found that a greater number of non-adherent patients experienced convulsive seizures in the past year as compared to those who were adherent to their medications (p = 0.006). Conclusion To enhance treatment adherence, the practice of prescribing more simpler treatment regimens among physicians can result in better seizure control, as the complexity of the regimen is found to be a major challenge for adjustment of AED regimens in this regard.
当患者至少有两次无诱因发作且发作间隔超过一天时,可考虑癫痫。癫痫发作的控制取决于多个因素,包括适当的治疗及其剂量、患者的日常活动以及对抗癫痫药物的依从性。本研究旨在评估癫痫患者对抗癫痫药物(AED)的依从率。
于2019年11月至2020年10月在巴基斯坦阿伯塔巴德阿尤布教学医院神经内科进行了一项横断面研究。所有因癫痫发作主诉到急诊室就诊、已知患有癫痫、年龄在18岁以上、无认知功能障碍或严重精神疾病的参与者均纳入研究。患有其他神经功能障碍(脑肿瘤、脑瘫、神经肌肉疾病)或严重精神病发作的患者以及未确诊癫痫病例的患者被排除在研究之外。使用预先定义的表格评估患者的依从性和不依从性水平,然后将他们分为各自的组。
共有150名参与者纳入研究。其中,110名患者坚持服用AED治疗,40名患者不依从。发现不依从的最常见原因是患者忘记服药(72.5%)。7.5%的患者在症状缓解后停止服药。约12.5%的患者表示经济负担是不依从的原因。与依从患者相比,不依从患者癫痫发作控制不佳的比例显著更高(77.5%对49.1%,p = 0.001)。还发现,与坚持服药的患者相比,过去一年中不依从患者经历惊厥发作的人数更多(p = 0.006)。
为提高治疗依从性,医生采用更简单的治疗方案可更好地控制癫痫发作,因为在这方面,治疗方案的复杂性是调整AED方案的一大挑战。