• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Authorship diversity in hematology-related Cochrane systematic reviews: Inequities in global representation.

作者信息

Biswas Jyotirmoy, Dhali Arkadeep, Rathna Roger B, D'Souza Christopher

机构信息

College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital Kolkata India.

Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Kolkata India.

出版信息

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 Aug 16;6(6):e12778. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12778. eCollection 2022 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/rth2.12778
PMID:35992194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9382216/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8f/9382216/cb51c4c771cc/RTH2-6-e12778-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8f/9382216/5caf80010394/RTH2-6-e12778-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8f/9382216/cb51c4c771cc/RTH2-6-e12778-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8f/9382216/5caf80010394/RTH2-6-e12778-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba8f/9382216/cb51c4c771cc/RTH2-6-e12778-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Authorship diversity in hematology-related Cochrane systematic reviews: Inequities in global representation.血液学相关Cochrane系统评价中的作者多样性：全球代表性方面的不平等。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022 Aug 16;6(6):e12778. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12778. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Authorship diversity in Gastroenterology-related Cochrane systematic reviews: Inequities in global representation.胃肠病学相关Cochrane系统评价中的作者多样性：全球代表性方面的不平等
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 2;9:982664. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.982664. eCollection 2022.
3
Inequities in Country- and Gender-Based Authorship Representation in Cardiology-Related Cochrane Reviews.心脏病学相关Cochrane系统评价中基于国家和性别的作者代表性不平等。
JACC Adv. 2022 Nov 30;1(5):100140. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100140. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Increasing number of authors in Cochrane reviews.Cochrane 综述中的作者人数不断增加。
J Evid Based Med. 2020 Feb;13(1):34-41. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12371. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
5
Group authorships in Cochrane had low compliance with Cochrane recommendations.Cochrane 中的作者群体对 Cochrane 建议的遵从度较低。
J Evid Based Med. 2020 Aug;13(3):199-205. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12396. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
6
Lack of Gender Diversity Among Systematic Reviews Authors in the Urological Literature (1998-2021).泌尿外科文献系统评价作者中缺乏性别多样性（1998 - 2021年）。
J Urol. 2022 Nov;208(5):1116-1123. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002925. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
7
Most overviews of Cochrane reviews neglected potential biases from dual authorship.大多数Cochrane系统评价的综述都忽略了双重作者身份带来的潜在偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;77:91-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
8
Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship.综述中评论的质量评价：有和无双重（共同）作者评论的比较。
Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 24;7(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0722-9.
9
Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews.Cochrane系统评价中荣誉作者和挂名作者的发生率。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2769-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2769.
10
More than one-third of Cochrane reviews had gift authors, whereas ghost authorship was rare.超过三分之一的 Cochrane 综述有馈赠作者，而幽灵作者则很少见。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;128:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender disparities in the National Institutes of Health funding for hematologic malignancies and cellular therapies.国家卫生研究院在血液恶性肿瘤和细胞疗法方面的资金投入存在性别差异。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2022 Jul;63(7):1708-1713. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2038378. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Annual report on equity, diversity, and inclusion: is meeting its goals.关于公平、多样性和包容性的年度报告：正在实现其目标。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 Nov 2;5(7):e12610. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12610. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
The Matilda Effect: Underrecognition of Women in Hematology and Oncology Awards.
玛蒂尔达效应：血液学和肿瘤学奖项中女性未得到充分认可。
Oncologist. 2021 Sep;26(9):779-786. doi: 10.1002/onco.13871. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
4
Diversity, equity, and inclusion in publishing: Calling thrombosis and hemostasis journals to action in support of women.出版领域的多样性、公平性与包容性：呼吁血栓与止血领域期刊行动起来支持女性。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Oct 16;4(7):1076-1079. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12434. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Impact of gender and caregiving responsibilities on academic success in hematology.性别和照顾责任对血液学学术成功的影响。
Blood Adv. 2020 Feb 25;4(4):755-761. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000084.