• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cochrane 综述中的作者人数不断增加。

Increasing number of authors in Cochrane reviews.

机构信息

Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

Cochrane Colorectal Group, Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

J Evid Based Med. 2020 Feb;13(1):34-41. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12371. Epub 2020 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1111/jebm.12371
PMID:32086993
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate authorship trends in Cochrane reviews from 1996 to 2018, and to examine if the authorship criteria from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) were met for Cochrane reviews with more than 15 authors based on the text in the section "Contributions of authors."

METHODS

The median number of authors per review was calculated, and authorship trends within each editorial group were analyzed. The section "Contributions of authors" was assessed about the first and second authorship criteria from the ICMJE for reviews with more than 15 authors.

RESULTS

A total of 7447 Cochrane reviews were studied based on data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The median number of authors per Cochrane review was 3 in 1996 (IQR 2.5-3, range 2-3), 4 in 2007 (IQR 3-5, range 1-13), and 5 in 2018 (IQR 4-7, range 2-22). Within each editorial group, the total number of authors either increased (26/55, 47%) or was unchanged (29/55, 53%). Based on the text in "Contributions of authors," 59% (16/27) of the reviews with more than 15 authors had authors that did not fulfil the ICMJE authorship criteria. However, the text in "Contributions of authors" was often difficult to interpret.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of authors per Cochrane review gradually increased from 1996 to 2018. The ICMJE authorship criteria were probably not met by all authors in more than half of the reviews with more than 15 authors.

摘要

目的

调查 1996 年至 2018 年 Cochrane 综述的作者趋势,并根据“作者贡献”部分的文本,检查超过 15 位作者的 Cochrane 综述是否符合国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)的作者标准。

方法

计算每篇综述的平均作者数,并分析每个编辑组内的作者趋势。评估超过 15 位作者的综述中,“作者贡献”部分关于 ICMJE 的第一和第二作者标准。

结果

根据 Cochrane 系统评价数据库的数据,共研究了 7447 篇 Cochrane 综述。1996 年每篇 Cochrane 综述的平均作者数为 3(中位数 2.5-3,范围 2-3),2007 年为 4(中位数 3-5,范围 1-13),2018 年为 5(中位数 4-7,范围 2-22)。在每个编辑组内,作者总数要么增加(26/55,47%),要么不变(29/55,53%)。根据“作者贡献”部分的文本,超过 15 位作者的综述中,59%(16/27)的综述的作者不符合 ICMJE 的作者标准。然而,“作者贡献”部分的文本往往难以解读。

结论

Cochrane 综述的作者数量从 1996 年逐渐增加到 2018 年。超过 15 位作者的综述中,可能有一半以上的综述不符合 ICMJE 的作者标准。

相似文献

1
Increasing number of authors in Cochrane reviews.Cochrane 综述中的作者人数不断增加。
J Evid Based Med. 2020 Feb;13(1):34-41. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12371. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
2
Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal.你为何认为自己应该成为这份手稿的作者?对某普通医学期刊作者开放性回复的分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Dec 20;12:189. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-189.
3
Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms.作者资格标准与贡献披露:3种具有不同作者贡献形式的综合医学期刊的比较
JAMA. 2004 Jul 7;292(1):86-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.1.86.
4
ICMJE authorship criteria are not met in a substantial proportion of manuscripts submitted to Biochemia Medica.提交给《生物化学医学》的大量稿件未符合国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)的作者资格标准。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Oct 15;25(3):324-34. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.033. eCollection 2015.
5
How the structure of contribution disclosure statements affects validity of authorship: a randomized study in a general medical journal.投稿贡献声明的结构如何影响作者身份的有效性:一项在综合性医学期刊上的随机研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Jun;22(6):1035-44. doi: 10.1185/030079906x104885.
6
Group authorships in Cochrane had low compliance with Cochrane recommendations.Cochrane 中的作者群体对 Cochrane 建议的遵从度较低。
J Evid Based Med. 2020 Aug;13(3):199-205. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12396. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
7
Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.研究者贡献与国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)作者资格标准的履行:对放射学领域发表的多作者研究文章中作者贡献列表的分析。国际医学期刊编辑委员会。
Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):16-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2261011255.
8
Authorship in a small medical journal: a study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors.小型医学期刊中的作者身份:对通讯作者贡献声明的研究
Sci Eng Ethics. 2004 Jul;10(3):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0007-7.
9
More than one-third of Cochrane reviews had gift authors, whereas ghost authorship was rare.超过三分之一的 Cochrane 综述有馈赠作者,而幽灵作者则很少见。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;128:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
10
Editors-in-chief perceptions of patients as (co) authors on publications and the acceptability of ICMJE authorship criteria: a cross-sectional survey.主编对患者作为出版物(共同)作者的看法以及国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)作者资格标准的可接受性:一项横断面调查。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 14;7(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00290-1.

引用本文的文献

1
A simple form could prevent authorship issues in Cochrane manuscripts: A cohort study.一种简单的表格形式可预防Cochrane手稿中的作者身份问题:一项队列研究。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Apr 5;2(4):e12053. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12053. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Mapping 60 Years of Psychophysiology: A Bibliometric Analysis of Journal Performance, Authorship Trends, and Thematic Evolution.绘制60年心理生理学图谱:期刊表现、作者趋势和主题演变的文献计量分析
Psychophysiology. 2025 Feb;62(2):e70002. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70002.
3
Bibliometric analysis of the Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica from 2013 to 2022.
2013 年至 2022 年《土耳其骨科与创伤学期刊》的文献计量分析。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2024 Nov 8;58(5):255-262. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2024.23172.
4
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades.三十年间Cochrane系统评价与非Cochrane系统评价的对比分析
Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;13(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02531-2.
5
Efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A survival meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单克隆抗体治疗视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的生存荟萃分析
Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2022 May 18;2(3):100064. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.100064. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
6
Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study.干预性综述 Cochrane 通俗易懂摘要的结论一致性、语言特点和易读性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01721-7.
7
A brief guide to the science and art of writing manuscripts in biomedicine.生物医学稿件撰写的科学与艺术简要指南。
J Transl Med. 2020 Nov 10;18(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02596-2.