Suppr超能文献

经皮椎体成形术和经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折:一项荟萃分析。

Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A metaanalysis.

作者信息

Shi-Ming Guo, Wen-Juan Luo, Yun-Mei Huang, Yin-Sheng Wu, Mei-Ya Huang, Yan-Ping Lin

机构信息

Institute of Bone Disease, Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou 350122, P. R. China.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2015 Jul-Aug;49(4):377-87. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.154892.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is the most common complication of osteoporosis, however, debate persists over which procedure of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is a better treatment. We performed a metaanalysis of prospective, randomized controlled and clinical controlled trials of PVP and BKP to determine the efficacy and safety for the treatment of OVCFs to reach a relatively conclusive answer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched computerized databases comparing efficacy and safety of PVP and BKP in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. These reports included pain relief, functional capacity (Oswestry disability index [ODI] score), anterior vertebral body height (AVBH), kyphotic angle and complications (i.e. cement leakage, incident fractures). Studies were assessed for methodological bias and potential reasons for heterogeneity were explored.

RESULTS

As of March 15, 2013, a PubMed search resulted in 761 articles, of which eleven studies encompassing 789 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The average length of followup is 17 months and 4.6% patients were lost to followup. Results of metaanalysis indicated that BKP is more effective for short term pain relief. In addition, BKP is more effective to restore the AVBH (anterior vertebral body height), ODI and kyphotic angle of OVCFs. Moreover, BKP need more polymethylmethacrylate amount.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of better effectiveness of BKP procedure, we believe BKP to be superior over PVP for the treatment of osteoporotic VCFs.

摘要

背景

骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)是骨质疏松最常见的并发症,然而,对于经皮椎体成形术(PVP)或球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术(BKP)哪种手术方式是更好的治疗方法仍存在争议。我们对PVP和BKP的前瞻性、随机对照和临床对照试验进行了荟萃分析,以确定治疗OVCF的疗效和安全性,从而得出相对确凿的答案。

材料与方法

我们检索了计算机化数据库,比较PVP和BKP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效和安全性。这些报告包括疼痛缓解情况、功能能力(Oswestry功能障碍指数[ODI]评分)、椎体前缘高度(AVBH)、后凸角和并发症(即骨水泥渗漏、新发骨折)。对研究进行方法学偏倚评估,并探讨异质性的潜在原因。

结果

截至2013年3月15日,PubMed检索到761篇文章,其中11项研究共789例患者符合纳入标准。平均随访时间为17个月,4.6%的患者失访。荟萃分析结果表明,BKP在短期疼痛缓解方面更有效。此外,BKP在恢复OVCF的AVBH(椎体前缘高度)、ODI和后凸角方面更有效。而且,BKP需要更多的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯量。

结论

就BKP手术效果更好而言,我们认为BKP在治疗骨质疏松性VCF方面优于PVP。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68b9/4510789/9f5a5b7ffee1/IJOrtho-49-377-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验