Suppr超能文献

放弃飞行?减少航空旅行的意图和政策支持的心理预测因素。

Give Up Flights? Psychological Predictors of Intentions and Policy Support to Reduce Air Travel.

作者信息

Berneiser Jessica M, Becker Annalena C, Loy Laura S

机构信息

User Behavior and Field Trials, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE, Freiburg, Germany.

Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:926639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926639. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Concerted, timely action for mitigating climate change is of uttermost importance to keep global warming as close to 1.5°C as possible. Air traffic already plays a strong role in driving climate change and is projected to grow-with only limited technical potential for decarbonizing this means of transport. Therefore, it is desirable to minimize the expansion of air traffic or even facilitate a reduction in affluent countries. Effective policies and behavioral change, especially among frequent flyers, can help to lower greenhouse gas emissions. For both, a positive evaluation and public support is indispensable. This study contributes to understanding air travel behavior and the perception of regulative policies. We examined the role of attitudes, perceived behavioral control, efficacy, global identity, and justice concerns for intentions to avoid flights and aviation-related environmental policy support. We conducted an online survey study with a quota sample of = 2,530 participants in Germany. The strongest positive predictors of intentions to refrain from flying and policy support were perceived behavioral control to travel without flying, efficacy beliefs that avoiding air travel contributes to climate change mitigation, and intergenerational justice concerns; pro-travel attitude was a negative predictor. Moreover, we tested whether the provision of additional information on climate impact, global and intranational inequalities as well as subsidies (implying intranational inequality) affected the intention to avoid air travel and policy support. We found no effects of the different types of information. Nor did we find an interaction between the type of information provided and global or national identity. Our results highlight the need for a shift within the mobility sector that facilitates attractive and accessible transport alternatives in order to strengthen people's behavioral control to choose other means than planes and their efficacy perceptions. Moreover, raising awareness of the impacts of climate change on future generations and developing strategies to promote people's concern for intergenerational justice might motivate people to reduce air travel and thereby contribute to a livable future for new generations.

摘要

采取协调一致、及时的行动来缓解气候变化对于将全球变暖尽可能控制在接近1.5°C至关重要。空中交通在推动气候变化方面已经发挥了重要作用,并且预计还会增长,而这种运输方式脱碳的技术潜力有限。因此,最好尽量减少空中交通的扩张,甚至在富裕国家推动其减少。有效的政策和行为改变,尤其是在常旅客中,有助于降低温室气体排放。对于这两者而言,积极的评估和公众支持不可或缺。本研究有助于理解航空旅行行为以及对监管政策的认知。我们考察了态度、感知行为控制、效能、全球身份认同和对正义的关注对于避免飞行的意图以及对航空相关环境政策支持的作用。我们对德国2530名参与者的配额样本进行了一项在线调查研究。避免飞行意图和政策支持的最强积极预测因素是感知到不乘坐飞机出行的行为控制、认为避免航空旅行有助于缓解气候变化的效能信念以及代际正义关注;支持旅行的态度是一个消极预测因素。此外,我们测试了提供有关气候影响、全球和国内不平等以及补贴(意味着国内不平等)的额外信息是否会影响避免航空旅行的意图和政策支持。我们没有发现不同类型信息的影响。我们也没有发现所提供信息的类型与全球或国家身份之间的相互作用。我们的研究结果凸显了交通领域需要进行转变,以促进有吸引力且便利的交通替代方案,从而增强人们选择飞机以外其他出行方式的行为控制以及他们的效能认知。此外,提高对气候变化对后代影响的认识,并制定策略来促进人们对代际正义的关注,可能会促使人们减少航空旅行,从而为新一代创造一个宜居的未来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4362/9387255/695a1a6f1c64/fpsyg-13-926639-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Give Up Flights? Psychological Predictors of Intentions and Policy Support to Reduce Air Travel.
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:926639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926639. eCollection 2022.
2
Mobility management to prevent, reduce, or delay driving a car in teenagers.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 16;8(8):CD009438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009438.pub2.
3
Young People's Behavioral Intentions towards Low-Carbon Travel: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2327. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052327.
5
'Green' on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel.
Glob Environ Change. 2017 Jan;42:136-147. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.005. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
6
Global and local concerns: what attitudes and beliefs motivate farmers to mitigate and adapt to climate change?
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052882. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
7
The role of chronological age in climate change attitudes, feelings, and behavioral intentions: The case of null results.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 21;18(6):e0286901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286901. eCollection 2023.
8
Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries.
Sci Adv. 2024 Feb 9;10(6):eadj5778. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj5778. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
9
Modeling smallholder livestock herders' intentions to adopt climate smart practices: An extended theory of planned behavior.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Nov;27(31):39105-39122. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09652-w. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
10
Climate policy support as a tool to control others' (but not own) environmental behavior?
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0269030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269030. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change.
Glob Environ Change. 2020 Nov;65:102194. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102194. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
2
Public support for air travel restrictions to address COVID-19 or climate change.
Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2021 Apr;93:102767. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102767. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
3
Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 8;16(12):e0260932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260932. eCollection 2021.
5
Moral Reasoning Enables Developmental and Societal Change.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov;16(6):1209-1225. doi: 10.1177/1745691620964076. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
6
The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018.
Atmos Environ (1994). 2021 Jan 1;244:117834. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA).
Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):245-269. doi: 10.1037/rev0000090. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
9
'Green' on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel.
Glob Environ Change. 2017 Jan;42:136-147. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.005. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
Cooperating with the future.
Nature. 2014 Jul 10;511(7508):220-3. doi: 10.1038/nature13530. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验