UGA Concussion Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Investigation performed at multiple sites.
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Oct;50(12):3406-3416. doi: 10.1177/03635465221118089. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
The prevalence of unreported concussions is high, and undiagnosed concussions can lead to worse postconcussion outcomes. It is not clear how those with a history of undiagnosed concussion perform on subsequent standard concussion baseline assessments.
To determine if previous concussion diagnosis status was associated with outcomes on the standard baseline concussion assessment battery.
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium participants (N = 29,934) self-reported concussion history with diagnosis status and completed standard baseline concussion assessments, including assessments for symptoms, mental status, balance, and neurocognition. Multiple linear regression models were used to estimate mean differences and 95% CIs among concussion history groups (no concussion history [n = 23,037; 77.0%], all previous concussions diagnosed [n = 5315; 17.8%], ≥1 previous concussions undiagnosed [n = 1582; 5.3%]) at baseline for all outcomes except symptom severity and Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) score, in which negative binomial models were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs). All models were adjusted for sex, race, ethnicity, sport contact level, and concussion count. Mean differences with 95% CIs excluding 0.00 and at least a small effect size (≥0.20), and those IRRs with 95% CIs excluding 1.00 and at least a small association (IRR, ≥1.10) were considered significant.
The ≥1 previous concussions undiagnosed group reported significantly greater symptom severity scores (IRR, ≥1.38) and BSI-18 (IRR, ≥1.31) scores relative to the no concussion history and all previous concussions diagnosed groups. The ≥1 previous concussions undiagnosed group performed significantly worse on 6 neurocognitive assessments while performing better on only 2 compared with the no concussion history and all previous concussions diagnosed groups. There were no between-group differences on mental status or balance assessments.
An undiagnosed concussion history was associated with worse clinical indicators at future baseline assessments. Individuals reporting ≥1 previous undiagnosed concussions exhibited worse baseline clinical indicators. This may suggest that concussion-related harm may be exacerbated when injuries are not diagnosed.
未报告的脑震荡发生率很高,未诊断的脑震荡可能导致更糟糕的脑震荡后结局。目前尚不清楚那些有未诊断脑震荡病史的患者在随后的标准脑震荡基线评估中表现如何。
确定以前的脑震荡诊断状况是否与标准基线脑震荡评估组合的结果相关。
横断面研究;证据水平,3 级。
脑震荡评估、研究和教育(CARE)联合会参与者(N=29934)自我报告脑震荡病史和诊断状况,并完成标准基线脑震荡评估,包括症状、精神状态、平衡和神经认知评估。使用多元线性回归模型估计无脑震荡史(n=23037;77.0%)、所有既往脑震荡均诊断(n=5315;17.8%)和至少一次既往脑震荡未诊断(n=1582;5.3%)的基线时所有结局(症状严重程度和Brief Symptom Inventory-18 [BSI-18]评分除外)的平均差异和 95%CI,在后者中使用负二项式模型计算发病率比(IRR)。所有模型均根据性别、种族、民族、运动接触水平和脑震荡次数进行调整。考虑到 0.00 和至少小效应量(≥0.20),以及 95%CI 排除 1.00 和至少小关联(IRR,≥1.10)的差异有统计学意义。
与无脑震荡史和所有既往脑震荡诊断组相比,至少一次既往脑震荡未诊断组报告的症状严重程度评分(IRR,≥1.38)和BSI-18 评分(IRR,≥1.31)更高。与无脑震荡史和所有既往脑震荡诊断组相比,至少一次既往脑震荡未诊断组在 6 项神经认知评估中表现明显更差,而仅在 2 项评估中表现更好。在精神状态或平衡评估中,各组之间没有差异。
未诊断的脑震荡病史与未来基线评估时更差的临床指标相关。报告至少一次既往未诊断脑震荡的个体在基线时表现出更差的临床指标。这可能表明,当损伤未被诊断时,与脑震荡相关的伤害可能会加剧。