Pediatric Translational Medicine Institution, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 23;12(8):e060270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060270.
To examine the association between mental health and executive dysfunction in general adolescents, and to identify whether home residence and school location would moderate that association.
A population-based cross-sectional study.
A subsample of the Shanghai Children's Health, Education, and Lifestyle Evaluation-Adolescents project. 16 sampled schools in Shangrao city located in downstream Yangtze River in southeast China (December 2018).
1895 adolescents (48.8% male) which were divided into three subpopulations: (A) adolescents who have urban hukou (ie, household registration in China) and attend urban schools (UU, n=292); (B) adolescents who have rural hukou and attend urban schools (RU, n=819) and (C) adolescents who have rural hukou and attend rural schools (RR, n=784).
The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 was used to assess adolescent mental health symptoms, and the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function (parent form) was applied to measure adolescent executive dysfunction in nature setting.
Mental health symptoms were common (depression: 25.2%, anxiety: 53.0%, stress: 19.7%) in our sample, and the prevalence rates were lower among UU adolescents than those among the RR and RU, with intersubgroup differences in screen exposure time explaining most of the variance. We found the three types of symptoms were strongly associated with executive dysfunction in general adolescents. We also observed a marginal moderating effect of urban-rural subgroup on the associations: UU adolescents with depression (OR 6.74, 95% CI 3.75 to 12.12) and anxiety (OR 5.56, 95% CI 1.86 to 16.66) had a higher executive dysfunction risk when compared with RR youths with depression (OR 1.93, 95% CI 0.91 to 4.12) and anxiety (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.33), respectively.
Rural adolescents experienced more mental health symptoms, whereas urban individuals with mental health problems had a higher executive dysfunction risk.
探讨一般青少年心理健康与执行功能障碍之间的关系,并确定家庭住址和学校位置是否会调节这种关系。
基于人群的横断面研究。
中国东南部长江下游上饶市上海儿童健康、教育和生活方式评估-青少年项目的一个抽样学校。16 所抽样学校(2018 年 12 月)。
1895 名青少年(48.8%为男性)分为三个亚群:(A)具有城市户口(即中国户籍)并就读于城市学校的青少年(UU,n=292);(B)具有农村户口并就读于城市学校的青少年(RU,n=819)和(C)具有农村户口并就读于农村学校的青少年(RR,n=784)。
采用抑郁焦虑和压力量表-21 评估青少年心理健康症状,采用行为评定量表的执行功能(家长形式)评估自然环境中青少年的执行功能障碍。
我们的样本中常见心理健康症状(抑郁:25.2%,焦虑:53.0%,压力:19.7%),且 UU 青少年的患病率低于 RR 和 RU 青少年,屏幕暴露时间的亚组差异解释了大部分方差。我们发现三种症状与一般青少年的执行功能障碍密切相关。我们还观察到城乡亚组对这些关联有一定的调节作用:与 RR 青少年相比,患有抑郁(OR 6.74,95%CI 3.75 至 12.12)和焦虑(OR 5.56,95%CI 1.86 至 16.66)的 UU 青少年的执行功能障碍风险更高,而 RR 青少年患有抑郁(OR 1.93,95%CI 0.91 至 4.12)和焦虑(OR 1.80,95%CI 1.39 至 2.33)。
农村青少年经历更多的心理健康症状,而有心理健康问题的城市个体则有更高的执行功能障碍风险。