Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Epilepsia. 2022 Sep;63 Suppl 1:S45-S54. doi: 10.1111/epi.17340.
Seizure clusters may initiate a chain of events that have economic as well as clinical consequences. The potential economic consequences of seizure clusters must be weighed against the cost of medication to attenuate them. This is true both for individual patients and for society. Data needed for economic analyses include the chance that a cluster will progress to an adverse outcome, such as a need for emergency care, the costs of such an outcome, the cost of a rescue medication (RM), and the effectiveness of the RM. Indirect costs, such as lost employment for patients and caregivers, must also be considered. Several types of economic analyses can be used to determine costs and benefits of a medical intervention. There are studies comparing different RMs from an economic perspective, but there is little direct information on the costs of using an RM versus allowing clusters to run their course. However, the high expense of consequences of seizure clusters makes it likely that effective RMs will make economic as well as medical sense for many patients.
癫痫发作群集可能引发一系列具有经济和临床后果的事件。必须权衡癫痫发作群集的潜在经济后果与减轻其发作的药物成本。这对于个体患者和整个社会来说都是如此。经济分析所需的数据包括群集进展为不良后果(如需要紧急护理)的可能性、这种后果的成本、抢救药物(RM)的成本以及 RM 的有效性。还必须考虑间接成本,例如患者和护理人员的失业。可以使用几种类型的经济分析来确定医疗干预的成本和收益。有一些研究从经济角度比较了不同的 RM,但关于使用 RM 与允许群集自行发作的成本的直接信息很少。然而,癫痫发作群集的后果代价高昂,这使得对于许多患者来说,有效的 RM 在经济和医疗方面都有意义。