El Hoss Sara, El Nemer Wassim, Rees David C
Red Cell Haematology Laboratory, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London and King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Aix Marseille University, EFS, CNRS, ADES, "Biologie des Groupes Sanguins," Marseille, France.
Hemasphere. 2022 Aug 18;6(9):e762. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000762. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by variable clinical outcomes, with some patients suffering life-threatening complications during childhood, and others living relatively symptom-free into old age. Because of this variability, there is an important potential role for precision medicine, in which particular different treatments are selected for different groups of patients. However, the application of precision medicine in SCD is limited by difficulties in identifying different prognostic groups and the small number of available treatments. The main genetic determinant of outcomes in SCD is the underlying β-globin genotype, with sickle cell anemia (HbSS) and hemoglobin SC disease (HbSC) forming the 2 major forms of the disease in most populations of African origin. Although there are clear differences in clinical outcomes between these conditions, treatments approaches are very similar, with little evidence on how to treat HbSC in particular. Other genomic information, such as the co-inheritance of α-thalassemia, or high fetal hemoglobin (HbF) levels, is of some prognostic value but insufficient to determine treatments. Precision medicine is further limited by the fact that the 2 main drugs used in SCD, penicillin and hydroxyurea, are currently recommended for all patients. Newer treatments, such as crizanlizumab and voxelotor, raise the possibility that groups will emerge who respond best to particular drugs or combinations. Perhaps the best current example of precision medicine in SCD is the selective use of blood transfusions as primary stroke prevention in children with evidence of cerebral vasculopathy. More precise treatments may emerge as we understand more about the pathology of SCD, including problems with erythropoiesis.
镰状细胞病(SCD)的临床结局具有多样性,一些患者在儿童期会出现危及生命的并发症,而另一些患者则相对无症状地活到老年。由于这种变异性,精准医学具有重要的潜在作用,即针对不同患者群体选择特定的不同治疗方法。然而,精准医学在SCD中的应用受到识别不同预后群体的困难以及可用治疗方法数量较少的限制。SCD结局的主要遗传决定因素是潜在的β珠蛋白基因型,在大多数非洲裔人群中,镰状细胞贫血(HbSS)和血红蛋白SC病(HbSC)构成了该疾病的两种主要形式。尽管这些情况在临床结局上存在明显差异,但治疗方法非常相似,特别是关于如何治疗HbSC的证据很少。其他基因组信息,如α地中海贫血的共同遗传或高胎儿血红蛋白(HbF)水平,具有一定的预后价值,但不足以确定治疗方法。精准医学还受到以下事实的限制:SCD中使用的两种主要药物青霉素和羟基脲目前推荐用于所有患者。新型治疗方法,如crizanlizumab和voxelotor,增加了出现对特定药物或联合用药反应最佳的群体的可能性。也许目前SCD中精准医学的最佳例子是在有脑血管病变证据的儿童中选择性使用输血作为主要中风预防措施。随着我们对SCD病理学的了解更多,包括红细胞生成问题,可能会出现更精确的治疗方法。