Lyshol Heidi, Gil Ana Paula, Tolonen Hanna, Namorado Sónia, Kislaya Irina, Barreto Marta, Antunes Liliana, Gaio Vânia, Santos Ana João, Rodrigues Ana Paula, Dias Carlos Matias
Department of Health and Inequality, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
CICS.NOVA - Interdisciplinary Center of Social Sciences, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Arch Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;80(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00939-7.
Participation rates in health surveys, recognized as an important quality dimension, have been declining over the years, which may affect representativeness and confidence in results. The Portuguese national health examination survey INSEF (2015) achieved a participation rate of 43.9%, which is in line with participation rates from other similar health examination surveys. The objective of this article is to describe how local teams of survey personnel conducted the survey, describing strategies used to solve practical survey problems and to try to increase the participation rate.
After a literature search, informal interviews were conducted with 14 public health officials from local health examination teams, regional and central authorities. Forty-one of the local staff members (survey personnel) also filled in a short questionnaire anonymously. The interviews and self-administered questionnaires were analysed using mixed methods, informed by thematic analysis.
The local teams believed that the detailed manual, described as a "cookbook for making a health examination survey", made it possible to maintain high scientific standards while allowing for improvising solutions to problems in the local context. The quality of the manual, supported by a series of training workshops with the central research and support team, gave the teams the confidence and knowledge to implement local solutions. Motivation and cohesion within the local teams were among the goals of the training process. Local teams felt empowered by being given large responsibilities and worked hard to incite people to attend the examination through a close and persuasive approach. Local teams praised their INSA contacts for being available for assistance throughout the survey, and said they were inspired to try harder to reach participants to please their contacts for interpersonal reasons.
The theory of organizational improvisation or bricolage, which means using limited resources to solve problems, was useful to discuss and understand what took place during INSEF. A detailed manual covering standard procedures, continuous monitoring of the data collection and face-to-face workshops, including role-play, were vital to assure high scientific standards and high participation rates in this health examination survey. Close contacts between the central team and local focal points in all regions and all survey sites were key to accommodating unexpected challenges and innovative solutions.
健康调查的参与率被视为一个重要的质量维度,多年来一直在下降,这可能会影响结果的代表性和可信度。葡萄牙全国健康检查调查INSEF(2015年)的参与率为43.9%,这与其他类似健康检查调查的参与率一致。本文的目的是描述调查人员的地方团队如何开展调查,介绍用于解决实际调查问题和提高参与率的策略。
在进行文献检索后,对来自地方健康检查团队、地区和中央当局的14名公共卫生官员进行了非正式访谈。41名地方工作人员(调查人员)也匿名填写了一份简短问卷。采用混合方法,以主题分析为依据,对访谈和自填问卷进行了分析。
地方团队认为,被描述为“健康检查调查指南”的详细手册,使得在保持高科学标准的同时,能够针对当地情况临时想出解决问题的办法。在中央研究与支持团队举办的一系列培训讲习班的支持下,手册的质量让团队有信心和知识来实施当地的解决方案。培训过程的目标之一是提高地方团队内部的积极性和凝聚力。地方团队因被赋予重大责任而感到有能力,并通过密切且有说服力的方式努力促使人们参加检查。地方团队赞扬他们在INSA的联系人在整个调查过程中随时提供帮助,并表示出于人际关系方面的原因,他们受到激励,更加努力地联系参与者以让联系人满意。
组织即兴发挥或拼合理论,即利用有限资源解决问题,有助于讨论和理解INSEF期间发生的情况。一份涵盖标准程序、对数据收集进行持续监测以及包括角色扮演在内的面对面讲习班的详细手册,对于确保此次健康检查调查的高科学标准和高参与率至关重要。中央团队与所有地区及所有调查地点的地方联络点之间的密切联系,是应对意外挑战和创新解决方案的关键。