• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究团队的演变:患者合作伙伴视角

Evolution of a research team: the patient partner perspective.

作者信息

Madison Suzanne, Colon-Moya Alex D, Morales-Cosme Wilfredo, Lorenzi Margie, Diaz Aracelis, Hickson Bridget, Monteiro Kathy, Muniz Ruiz Alexander, Perez Addie, Redondo Richard, Reid Dennis, Robles Janet, Santiago Marsha, Thompson Opal, Wade Joyce, White Mary, Castillo Graciela, Valenzuela Cristian

机构信息

Patient Partner/Advisor, 6337 Alderwood Circle, #B, St. Paul, MN, 55129, USA.

Patient Partner/Advisor, South Jordan, UT, USA.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 24;8(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00377-3.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-022-00377-3
PMID:36002877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9400573/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite a movement toward the inclusion of patient partners or advisors as part of the research team in all funded studies, few publications have discussed patient engagement from the patient partners' perspective.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted by independent qualitative researchers to collect and summarize the experiences and perspectives of the 16 Patient Partners (PPs) on the study team for PeRson EmPowered Asthma RElief (PREPARE), a large, pragmatic study of 1200 African American/Black (AA/B) and Hispanic/Latinx (H/L) adults with asthma. This study was funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

RESULTS

This paper, authored by the PPs themselves, summarizes qualitative interview findings. The journey of the PREPARE PPs began with a desire to learn more about asthma and advocate for other individuals with asthma. Many challenges, including intimidation and lack of trust, were overcome as the research team prioritized building a comfortable environment in which PPs' lived experiences, opinions, and cultural beliefs are valued, and in which PP voices are centered and respected. Over time, the PPs gained confidence in expressing ideas and feedback, and in taking ownership of their role as valued members of the research team. The PP experience has had tremendous personal and professional impact on the PPs themselves, while also modeling a change in the way researchers and PPs relate to and partner with each other.

CONCLUSION

The partnership between PPs and researchers in the PREPARE study has elevated the PP role from external advisors to integral and empowered members of a collective research team, and the partnership developed and evolved over time.

摘要

引言

尽管在所有资助研究中都有将患者合作伙伴或顾问纳入研究团队的趋势,但很少有出版物从患者合作伙伴的角度讨论患者参与情况。

方法

由独立的定性研究人员进行定性访谈,以收集和总结16名患者合作伙伴(PPs)在“以患者为中心的哮喘缓解研究”(PREPARE)研究团队中的经历和观点。PREPARE是一项针对1200名患有哮喘的非裔美国人/黑人(AA/B)和西班牙裔/拉丁裔(H/L)成年人的大型实用性研究。该研究由患者为中心的结果研究所资助。

结果

本文由患者合作伙伴自己撰写,总结了定性访谈结果。PREPARE患者合作伙伴的历程始于他们希望更多地了解哮喘并为其他哮喘患者发声的愿望。随着研究团队优先营造一个舒适的环境,在这个环境中患者合作伙伴的生活经历、意见和文化信仰受到重视,他们的声音得到关注和尊重,许多挑战,包括恐吓和缺乏信任等问题都得以克服。随着时间的推移,患者合作伙伴在表达想法和反馈以及作为研究团队中有价值的成员发挥自身作用方面获得了信心。患者合作伙伴的经历对他们自身产生了巨大的个人和职业影响,同时也为研究人员和患者合作伙伴之间相互关系和合作方式的改变树立了典范。

结论

在PREPARE研究中,患者合作伙伴与研究人员之间的合作将患者合作伙伴的角色从外部顾问提升为集体研究团队中不可或缺且有影响力的成员,并且这种合作随着时间的推移不断发展和演变。

相似文献

1
Evolution of a research team: the patient partner perspective.研究团队的演变:患者合作伙伴视角
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 24;8(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00377-3.
2
A rapid realist review of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and health care system impacts: part one.以患者为导向的研究中患者参与及医疗保健系统影响的快速实证综述:第一部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 10;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00299-6.
3
Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study.探索患者及护理者对患者伴侣角色意义的认知:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 28;9(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00511-9.
4
The value of involving patients and public in health services research and evaluation: a qualitative study.让患者和公众参与卫生服务研究与评估的价值:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 29;7(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00289-8.
5
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
6
Evaluation of an integrated knowledge translation approach used for updating the Cochrane Review of Patient Decision Aids: a pre-post mixed methods study.用于更新《Cochrane患者决策辅助工具综述》的综合知识转化方法的评估:一项前后对比的混合方法研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 9;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00550-w.
7
Patient engagement in a national research network: barriers, facilitators, and impacts.患者参与国家研究网络:障碍、促进因素及影响
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 8;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00418-5.
8
Co-learning commentary: a patient partner perspective in mental health care research.共同学习评论:心理健康护理研究中患者伙伴的视角
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 18;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00435-4.
9
Determining the benefits and drawbacks of parents using personal connections and social networks for recruitment in research projects: a qualitative study.确定父母利用私人关系和社交网络为研究项目招募参与者的利弊:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 26;9(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00470-1.
10
The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees.患者参与对加拿大安大略省试验及试验人员的影响:一项对IMPACT奖获得者的访谈研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 7;8(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00381-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards conceptualizing patients as partners in health systems: a systematic review and descriptive synthesis.将患者概念化为卫生系统的合作伙伴:系统评价和描述性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00954-8.
2
Approaches to co-production of research in care homes: a scoping review.养老院研究联合生产的方法:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 23;8(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00408-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Co-production Just a Pipe Dream for Applied Health Research Commissioning? An Exploratory Literature Review.联合生产对于应用健康研究委托而言只是一个白日梦吗?一项探索性文献综述。
Front Sociol. 2019 Jun 24;4:50. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00050. eCollection 2019.
2
A randomized, open-label, pragmatic study to assess reliever-triggered inhaled corticosteroid in African American/Black and Hispanic/Latinx adults with asthma: Design and methods of the PREPARE trial.一项评估在患有哮喘的非裔美国/黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔成年人中使用缓解触发型吸入皮质类固醇的随机、开放标签、实用研究:PREPARE 试验的设计和方法。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Feb;101:106246. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106246. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
Adherence to adding inhaled corticosteroids to rescue therapy in a pragmatic trial with adults with asthma: A pilot study.在一项针对哮喘成人的实用试验中,坚持将吸入性皮质类固醇加入缓解治疗:一项初步研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 May;124(5):487-493.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.12.027. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
Patient Engagement in Medical Research Among Older Adults: Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey.老年人参与医学研究情况:健康信息国家趋势调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 29;21(10):e15035. doi: 10.2196/15035.
5
From community engagement, to community-engaged research, to broadly engaged team science.从社区参与,到社区参与式研究,再到广泛参与的团队科学。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr 12;1(1):5-6. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.1. eCollection 2017 Feb.
6
Who represents me? A patient-derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs).谁代表我?通过患者和家庭咨询委员会(PFAC)实现患者参与的患者衍生模型。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):148-158. doi: 10.1111/hex.12983. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
Measuring the Impact of Patient-Engaged Research: How a Methods Workshop Identified Critical Outcomes of Research Engagement.衡量患者参与研究的影响:一个方法研讨会如何确定研究参与的关键成果。
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2017 Nov 6;4(4):237-246. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1458. eCollection 2017 Fall.
8
Patients participating as co-researchers in health research: A systematic review of outcomes and experiences.作为共同研究者参与健康研究的患者:结局与体验的系统评价
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Aug;48(6):617-628. doi: 10.1177/1403494819863514. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
9
'We're passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in': Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory.“我们是同乘一艘船的乘客,但我们有自己的卧铺睡觉”:在区域研究计划中评估患者和公众的参与:一项受正常化进程理论启发的行动研究项目。
PLoS One. 2019 May 14;14(5):e0215953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215953. eCollection 2019.
10
Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.患者参与研究:患者中心的结局研究所的初步发现。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):359-367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067.