• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Commentary: Is this a case in which we know what we don't know what we don't know?

作者信息

Nantsios Alex, Rubens Fraser D

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JTCVS Open. 2021 Sep 8;8:336-337. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.005. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.005
PMID:36004098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9390589/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f4c/9390589/871f7f894efb/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f4c/9390589/871f7f894efb/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f4c/9390589/871f7f894efb/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Commentary: Is this a case in which we know what we don't know what we don't know?评论：这是一个我们知道自己不知道自己不知道什么的情况吗？
JTCVS Open. 2021 Sep 8;8:336-337. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.09.005. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Education-based disparities in knowledge of novel health risks: The case of knowledge gaps in HIV risk perceptions.基于教育的新型健康风险知识差距：以 HIV 风险认知中的知识差距为例。
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 May;23(2):420-435. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12297. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
International Trade and Investment and Food Systems: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and What We Don't Know We Don't Know.国际贸易和投资与食物系统：我们知道什么、不知道什么，以及我们不知道我们不知道什么。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(12):886-895. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.202.
4
Knowing that you don't know: metamemory and discourse processing.自知无知：元记忆与话语处理
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Nov;23(6):1378-93. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.6.1378.
5
An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children.对儿童法医面谈中“不知道”回答的一项调查。
Behav Sci Law. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):746-61. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2141. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
6
Commentary: When we don't know what we don't know.评论：当我们不知道自己不知道什么的时候。
JTCVS Tech. 2020 Nov 30;6:102-103. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.11.025. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Pregnancy: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and What We Don't Know We Don't Know.孕期抗血管内皮生长因子治疗：我们已知的、未知的以及我们不知道自己不知道的。
Retina. 2016 Aug;36(8):1413-7. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001200.
8
What You Don't Know: Improving Family Health History Knowledge among Multigenerational Families of Mexican Origin.你所不知道的：提高墨西哥裔多代家庭的家族健康史知识水平。
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(2):93-101. doi: 10.1159/000443473. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
9
The effect of a 'don't know' option on test scores: number-right and formula scoring compared.“不知道”选项对考试成绩的影响：正确题数计分与公式计分的比较
Med Educ. 1999 Apr;33(4):267-75. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00292.x.
10
"I don't know" responses in elderly depressives and in dementia.老年抑郁症患者和痴呆症患者的“我不知道”回答。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985 Apr;33(4):253-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb07112.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of invasive treatment strategies in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者侵入性治疗策略的比较：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JTCVS Open. 2021 Sep 8;8:323-335. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.08.028. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Surgical revascularization for acute coronary syndromes: a report from the North Rhine-Westphalia surgical myocardial infarction registry.急性冠状动脉综合征的外科血管重建术：来自北莱茵-威斯特法伦州外科心肌梗死登记处的报告。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Dec 1;58(6):1137-1144. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa260.
3
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄：NOBLE 随机非劣效性试验的 5 年更新结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 7;381(19):1820-1830. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
5
The SYNTAX score according to diabetic status: What does it mean for the patient requiring myocardial revascularization?根据糖尿病状态的SYNTAX评分：对于需要心肌血运重建的患者意味着什么？
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;159(3):857-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.04.088. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
6
Comparison of Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架植入术的疗效比较
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;120(3):380-386. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.038. Epub 2017 May 10.
7
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南：执行摘要：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2014 Dec 23;130(25):2354-94. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000133. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
8
Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes.多血管血运重建策略在糖尿病患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 20;367(25):2375-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211585. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
9
Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data.非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者常规策略与选择性有创策略的长期预后：一项个体化患者数据分析的荟萃分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 1;55(22):2435-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.007. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗严重冠状动脉疾病的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):961-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626. Epub 2009 Feb 18.