Suppr超能文献

血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中性粒细胞减少性发热期间通过宏基因组下一代测序进行病原体检测

Pathogen Detection by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing During Neutropenic Fever in Patients With Hematological Malignancies.

作者信息

Schulz Eduard, Grumaz Silke, Hatzl Stefan, Gornicec Maximilian, Valentin Thomas, Huber-Kraßnitzer Bianca, Kriegl Lisa, Uhl Barbara, Deutsch Alexander, Greinix Hildegard, Krause Robert, Neumeister Peter

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Noscendo GmbH, Duisburg, Germany.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 30;9(8):ofac393. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac393. eCollection 2022 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy is a major cause of morbidity during cancer treatment. The performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of circulating cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid from plasma may be superior to blood culture (BC) diagnostics for identification of causative pathogens. The aim of this study was to validate mNGS (DISQVER test) for the detection of pathogens in hematologic patients with FN.

METHODS

We collected paired whole blood specimens from central venous catheter and peripheral vein during FN for BC and mNGS testing. We repeated paired sampling at the earliest after 3 days of fever, which was defined as 1 FN episode. All clinical data were retrospectively reviewed by an infectious disease expert panel. We calculated percent positive agreement (PPA), percent negative agreement (PNA), percent overall agreement (POA), and sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 98 unselected FN episodes in 61 patients who developed predominantly FN after conditioning therapy for allogeneic ( = 22) or autologous ( = 21) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Success rate of mNGS was 99% (97 of 98). Positivity rate of mNGS was 43% (42 of 97) overall and 32% (31 of 97) excluding viruses compared to 14% (14 of 98) in BC. The PPA, PNA, and POA between mNGS and BC were 84.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.6% to 98.1%), 63.1% (95% CI, 51.9% to 73.4%), and 66% (95% CI, 55.7% to 75.3%), respectively. Sensitivity for bacteria or fungi was 40% (95% CI, 28.0% to 52.9%) and 18.5% (95% CI, 9.9% to 30.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathogen detection by mNGS (DISQVER) during unselected FN episodes shows 2-fold higher sensitivity and a broader pathogen spectrum than BC.

摘要

背景

化疗后发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)是癌症治疗期间发病的主要原因。血浆中循环游离脱氧核糖核酸的宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)在识别致病病原体方面的表现可能优于血培养(BC)诊断。本研究的目的是验证mNGS(DISQVER检测)在检测FN血液病患者病原体中的作用。

方法

我们在FN期间从中心静脉导管和外周静脉采集配对的全血标本用于BC和mNGS检测。在发热3天后尽早重复配对采样,发热定义为1次FN发作。所有临床数据均由传染病专家小组进行回顾性审查。我们计算了阳性一致率(PPA)、阴性一致率(PNA)、总体一致率(POA)以及敏感性和特异性。

结果

我们分析了61例患者的总共98次未选择的FN发作,这些患者主要在异基因(n = 22)或自体(n = 21)造血干细胞移植的预处理治疗后发生FN。mNGS的成功率为99%(98例中的97例)。mNGS的总体阳性率为43%(97例中的42例),排除病毒后为32%(97例中的31例),而BC的阳性率为14%(98例中的14例)。mNGS与BC之间的PPA、PNA和POA分别为84.6%(95%置信区间[CI],54.6%至98.1%)、63.1%(95%CI,51.9%至73.4%)和66%(95%CI,55.7%至75.3%)。对细菌或真菌的敏感性分别为40%(95%CI,28.0%至52.9%)和18.5%(95%CI,9.9%至30.0%)。

结论

在未选择的FN发作期间,通过mNGS(DISQVER)进行病原体检测显示出比BC高2倍的敏感性和更广泛的病原体谱。

相似文献

1
Pathogen Detection by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing During Neutropenic Fever in Patients With Hematological Malignancies.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 30;9(8):ofac393. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac393. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
mNGS for identifying pathogens in febrile neutropenic children with hematological diseases.
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;116:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.335. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
6
Clinical metagenomic sequencing of plasma microbial cell-free DNA for febrile neutropenia in patients with acute leukaemia.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024 Jan;30(1):107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.05.034. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
7
The impact of neutrophil count on the results of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in immunocompromised febrile children.
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 11;10(12):e32816. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32816. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
10
Diagnostic efficiency of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for suspected infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Sep 13;13:1251509. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1251509. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

8
Pathogen detection by targeted next-generation sequencing test in adult hematological malignancies patients with suspected infections.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 24;11:1443596. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1443596. eCollection 2024.
9
Getting Up to Speed: Rapid Pathogen and Antimicrobial Resistance Diagnostics in Sepsis.
Microorganisms. 2024 Sep 3;12(9):1824. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091824.
10
Evaluating metagenomics and targeted approaches for diagnosis and surveillance of viruses.
Genome Med. 2024 Sep 9;16(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01380-x.

本文引用的文献

1
A metagenomic DNA sequencing assay that is robust against environmental DNA contamination.
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 21;13(1):4197. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31654-0.
2
Next-Generation Sequencing to Detect Pathogens in Pediatric Febrile Neutropenia: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 112 Cases.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;8(11):ofab223. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab223. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Presence of viremia during febrile neutropenic episodes in patients undergoing chemotherapy for malignant neoplasms.
Am J Hematol. 2021 Jun 1;96(6):719-726. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26177. Epub 2021 May 3.
9
Rapid Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Diagnostics of Bacteremia in Septic Patients.
J Mol Diagn. 2020 Mar;22(3):405-418. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.12.006.
10
Prognostic impact of circulating tumor DNA status post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in AML and MDS.
Blood. 2019 Jun 20;133(25):2682-2695. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-880690. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验