Weiss Emily R, Todman McWelling, Maple Emily, Bunn Rebecca R
Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10011, USA.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Aug 21;12(8):298. doi: 10.3390/bs12080298.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, studies have demonstrated increases in boredom and its negative impact on mental health. This cross-sectional study examines state and trait boredom at four different points of the pandemic using an online sample of participants from the United States ( = 783). The results showed significant increases in boredom proneness, state boredom, substance use, loneliness, and distress. Boredom was associated with increases in each of these variables and a greater likelihood of testing positive for COVID-19. Moreover, the increases in distress, loneliness, and substance use became non-significant when controlling for boredom. Boredom proneness remained associated with all adverse outcomes when accounting for state boredom. In contrast, the relationships between state boredom and most adverse outcomes lost significance when controlling for boredom proneness, and state boredom was positively associated with increased hope for the future. Overall, the results suggest that high boredom proneness is an important vulnerability factor for poor psychological health and risky behaviors during the pandemic. However, high levels of recent state boredom, independent of boredom proneness, do not predict similarly negative outcomes. State boredom may indicate the extent to which one remains hopeful that circumstances will improve without resorting to risky, potentially maladaptive coping strategies.
在整个新冠疫情期间,研究表明无聊感有所增加及其对心理健康产生负面影响。这项横断面研究使用来自美国的在线样本参与者((n = 783)),在疫情的四个不同时间点考察了状态无聊和特质无聊。结果显示无聊倾向、状态无聊、物质使用、孤独感和痛苦感显著增加。无聊与这些变量中的每一个增加以及新冠病毒检测呈阳性的可能性更大有关。此外,在控制无聊因素后,痛苦感、孤独感和物质使用的增加变得不显著。在考虑状态无聊时,无聊倾向仍然与所有不良后果相关。相比之下,在控制无聊倾向后,状态无聊与大多数不良后果之间的关系失去了显著性,并且状态无聊与对未来的希望增加呈正相关。总体而言,结果表明高无聊倾向是疫情期间心理健康不佳和危险行为的一个重要脆弱因素。然而,近期高水平的状态无聊,独立于无聊倾向,并不会预测出类似的负面结果。状态无聊可能表明一个人在不诉诸危险的、潜在适应不良的应对策略的情况下,对情况改善保持希望的程度。