Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technologygrid.418907.3 Jena, Jena, Germany.
InfectoGnostics Research Campus Jena, Jena, Germany.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0076322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00763-22. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is classified as one of the priority pathogens that threaten human health. Resistance detection with conventional microbiological methods takes several days, forcing physicians to administer empirical antimicrobial treatment that is not always appropriate. A need exists for a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective method that allows targeted antimicrobial therapy in limited time. In this pilot study, we investigate the efficacy of three different label-free Raman spectroscopic approaches to differentiate methicillin-resistant and -susceptible clinical isolates of S. aureus (MSSA). Single-cell analysis using 532 nm excitation was shown to be the most suitable approach since it captures information on the overall biochemical composition of the bacteria, predicting 87.5% of the strains correctly. UV resonance Raman microspectroscopy provided a balanced accuracy of 62.5% and was not sensitive enough in discriminating MRSA from MSSA. Excitation of 785 nm directly on the petri dish provided a balanced accuracy of 87.5%. However, the difference between the strains was derived from the dominant staphyloxanthin bands in the MRSA, a cell component not associated with the presence of methicillin resistance. This is the first step toward the development of label-free Raman spectroscopy for the discrimination of MRSA and MSSA using single-cell analysis with 532 nm excitation. Label-free Raman spectra capture the high chemical complexity of bacterial cells. Many different Raman approaches have been developed using different excitation wavelength and cell analysis methods. This study highlights the major importance of selecting the most suitable Raman approach, capable of providing spectral features that can be associated with the cell mechanism under investigation. It is shown that the approach of choice for differentiating MRSA from MSSA should be single-cell analysis with 532 nm excitation since it captures the difference in the overall biochemical composition. These results should be taken into consideration in future studies aiming for the development of label-free Raman spectroscopy as a clinical analytical tool for antimicrobial resistance determination.
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)被列为威胁人类健康的优先病原体之一。传统微生物学方法的耐药性检测需要数天时间,这迫使医生进行经验性的抗菌治疗,而这种治疗并不总是合适的。因此,需要一种快速、准确、具有成本效益的方法,以便在有限的时间内进行靶向抗菌治疗。在这项初步研究中,我们研究了三种不同的无标记拉曼光谱方法区分耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)临床分离株的效果。使用 532nm 激发的单细胞分析被证明是最适合的方法,因为它可以捕获细菌整体生化组成的信息,正确预测了 87.5%的菌株。紫外共振拉曼微光谱提供了 62.5%的平衡准确性,并且在区分 MRSA 和 MSSA 方面不够敏感。在培养皿上直接用 785nm 激发提供了 87.5%的平衡准确性。然而,MRSA 和 MSSA 之间的差异来自于 MRSA 中占主导地位的金葡素带,而金葡素是与耐甲氧西林的存在无关的细胞成分。这是朝着使用 532nm 激发的单细胞分析开发无标记拉曼光谱区分 MRSA 和 MSSA 的第一步。无标记拉曼光谱捕捉到细菌细胞的高化学复杂性。已经开发了许多不同的拉曼方法,使用不同的激发波长和细胞分析方法。本研究强调了选择最适合的拉曼方法的重要性,这种方法能够提供与所研究的细胞机制相关的光谱特征。结果表明,用于区分 MRSA 和 MSSA 的首选方法应该是使用 532nm 激发的单细胞分析,因为它可以捕捉到整体生化组成的差异。这些结果应该在未来旨在将无标记拉曼光谱发展为用于确定抗菌药物耐药性的临床分析工具的研究中加以考虑。