Suppr超能文献

器械简报工具在提高手术安全性方面的效用。

Utility of a Device Briefing Tool to Improve Surgical Safety.

机构信息

Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2022 Dec;280:218-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.018. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clear communication around surgical device use is crucial to patient safety. We evaluated the utility of the Device Briefing Tool (DBT) as an adjunct to the Surgical Safety Checklist.

METHODS

A nonrandomized, controlled pilot of the DBT was conducted with surgical teams at an academic referral center. Intervention departments used the DBT in all cases involving a surgical device for 10 wk. Utility, relative advantage, and implementation effectiveness were evaluated via surveys. Trained observers assessed adherence and team performance using the Oxford NOTECHS system.

RESULTS

Of 113 individuals surveyed, 91 responded. Most respondents rated the DBT as moderately to extremely useful. Utility was greatest for complex devices (89%) and new devices (88%). Advantages included insight into the team's familiarity with devices (70%) and improved teamwork and communication (68%). Users found it unrealistic to review all device instructional materials (54%). Free text responses suggested that the DBT heightened awareness of deficiencies in device familiarity and training but lacked a clear mechanism to correct them. DBT adherence was 82%. NOTECHS scores in intervention departments improved over the course of the study but did not significantly differ from comparator departments.

CONCLUSIONS

The DBT was rated highly by both surgeons and nurses. Adherence was high and we found no evidence of "checklist fatigue." Centers interested in implementing the DBT should focus on devices that are complex or new to any surgical team member. Guidance for correcting deficiencies identified by the DBT will be provided in future iterations of the tool.

摘要

简介

手术器械使用方面的清晰沟通对患者安全至关重要。我们评估了器械简介工具(DBT)作为手术安全检查表的辅助工具的效用。

方法

在学术转诊中心,对手术团队进行了 DBT 的非随机对照试点研究。干预部门在涉及手术器械的所有情况下,在 10 周内使用 DBT。通过调查评估了实用性、相对优势和实施效果。经过培训的观察员使用牛津 NOTECHS 系统评估了依从性和团队表现。

结果

在接受调查的 113 人中,有 91 人做出了回应。大多数受访者认为 DBT 非常有用。复杂器械(89%)和新器械(88%)的实用性最大。优点包括深入了解团队对器械的熟悉程度(70%)和改善团队合作和沟通(68%)。用户发现审查所有器械使用说明书(54%)不切实际。自由文本回复表明,DBT 提高了对器械熟悉度和培训缺陷的认识,但缺乏纠正这些缺陷的明确机制。DBT 的依从率为 82%。干预部门的 NOTECHS 评分在研究过程中有所提高,但与对照组部门没有显著差异。

结论

DBT 得到了外科医生和护士的高度评价。依从性很高,我们没有发现“检查表疲劳”的证据。有兴趣实施 DBT 的中心应关注对任何手术团队成员来说都是复杂或新的器械。未来 DBT 版本将提供纠正 DBT 识别出的缺陷的指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验