Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, UK.
Patient Reported Outcomes, Janssen Global Services LLC, Titusville, Florida, USA.
Lupus Sci Med. 2022 Aug;9(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000712.
SLE and lupus nephritis (LN) have significant impacts on the health-related quality of life of patients living with the condition, which are important to capture from the patient's perspective using patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the content validity of PROs commonly used in SLE and LN (36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) and Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL), as well as novel PRO symptom severity items measuring skin rash, joint pain, joint stiffness and swelling of the legs and/or feet, in both populations.
Qualitative, semi-structured, cognitive interviews were conducted with 48 participants (SLE=28, LN=20). Understanding and relevance of symptom and impact PRO concepts from existing PROs were assessed, alongside novel PRO symptom severity items with different recall periods (24 hours vs 7 days) and response scales (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) vs Verbal Rating Scale). Interviews were conducted in multiple rounds to allow for modifications to the novel PRO items. Analysis of verbatim interview transcripts was performed.
Symptom and impact concepts assessed by the SF-36, FACIT-F, and LupusQoL were well understood by both participants with SLE and LN (≥90.0%), with most considered relevant by over half of the participants asked (≥51.9%). All participants asked (100%) understood the novel PRO symptom severity items, and the majority (≥90.0%) considered the symptoms relevant. Minor modifications to the novel PRO items were made between rounds to improve clarity based on participant feedback. The selected 7-day recall period and NRS in the final iteration of the PRO items were understood and relevant. No differences in interview findings between the SLE and LN samples were identified.
Findings provide evidence of content validity for concepts assessed by the SF-36, FACIT-F, LupusQoL and the novel PRO symptom severity items, supporting use of these PROs to comprehensively assess disease impact in future SLE and LN clinical trials.
系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)和狼疮性肾炎(LN)对患者的健康相关生活质量有显著影响,从患者角度使用患者报告结局(PRO)来捕捉这些影响非常重要。本研究的目的是评估常用于 SLE 和 LN 的 PRO(36 项简明健康调查量表(SF-36)、慢性疾病治疗疲劳功能评估-疲乏(FACIT-F)和狼疮生活质量(LupusQoL))以及新的 PRO 症状严重程度条目(测量皮疹、关节痛、关节僵硬和腿部和/或脚部肿胀)在这两种人群中的内容效度。
对 48 名参与者(SLE=28,LN=20)进行了定性、半结构化的认知访谈。评估了现有 PRO 中症状和影响 PRO 概念的理解和相关性,以及具有不同回忆期(24 小时与 7 天)和反应量表(数字评分量表(NRS)与言语评分量表)的新的 PRO 症状严重程度条目。为了对新的 PRO 条目进行修改,进行了多轮访谈。对逐字记录的访谈记录进行了分析。
SF-36、FACIT-F 和 LupusQoL 评估的症状和影响概念被 SLE 和 LN 患者(≥90.0%)充分理解,大多数被超过一半的参与者(≥51.9%)认为相关。所有参与者(100%)都理解新的 PRO 症状严重程度条目,大多数(≥90.0%)认为这些症状相关。根据参与者的反馈,对新的 PRO 条目进行了一些小的修改,以提高清晰度。在 PRO 条目的最终迭代中选择了 7 天的回忆期和 NRS,参与者理解并认为相关。在 SLE 和 LN 样本之间,访谈结果没有差异。
研究结果为 SF-36、FACIT-F、LupusQoL 和新的 PRO 症状严重程度条目的评估概念提供了内容效度的证据,支持在未来的 SLE 和 LN 临床试验中使用这些 PRO 全面评估疾病的影响。