Suppr超能文献

系统性红斑狼疮类固醇问卷(SSQ)的开发:一种用于评估口服类固醇治疗影响的新型患者报告结局工具。

Development of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Steroid Questionnaire (SSQ): a novel patient-reported outcome tool to assess the impact of oral steroid treatment.

作者信息

Mathias Susan D, Berry Pamela, De Vries Jane, Askanase Anca, Pascoe Katie, Colwell Hilary H, Chang David J

机构信息

Health Outcomes Solutions, PO Box 2343, Winter Park, FL, 32790, USA.

GSK, King of Prussia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 28;15(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0609-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral glucocorticoids (steroids) are the mainstay of treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but their use is often associated with short- and long-term side effects. Following a literature review and discussions with patients with SLE, clinicians, and payers, a need was identified for a comprehensive SLE-specific tool that can be used to evaluate the side effects and benefits of steroids over time from a patient perspective. The objective of this study was to develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess general impact (baseline burden), benefits, side effects, and impacts associated with the use of oral steroids in patients with SLE.

METHODS

A qualitative research protocol was developed in which adults with SLE currently receiving or who had received steroids in the past year were recruited from six US rheumatology practices to participate in concept elicitation (CE) interviews. The SLE Steroid Questionnaire (SSQ) was developed based on CE interview results and clinical input. Cognitive debriefing interviews with a second group of patients with SLE evaluated the content, clarity, and relevance of the items. The SSQ was refined using patient feedback, clinician review, and a translatability assessment. The protocol received central independent review board approval.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (52% moderate disease severity; 58% currently receiving steroids, mean dose 8.7 mg/day) completed CE interviews. Patients reported benefits, side effects, and impacts from steroids. The refined SSQ contains 50 items assessing steroid dose/duration (4 items), general impact (baseline burden; 19 items), benefits (7 items), work/productivity (3 items), side effects (10 items), emotions (6 items), and overall satisfaction (1 item).

CONCLUSION

The SSQ is a unique PRO, developed using robust scientific methodology in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration PRO Guidance. It was designed to comprehensively assess the patient experience with steroid therapy and better understand the benefits and burden of steroids for patients with SLE.

摘要

背景

口服糖皮质激素(类固醇)是系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)治疗的主要手段,但其使用常伴有短期和长期副作用。在对文献进行综述并与SLE患者、临床医生及医保支付方进行讨论后,发现需要一种全面的、针对SLE的工具,可从患者角度评估类固醇随时间推移产生的副作用和益处。本研究的目的是开发一种患者报告结局(PRO)测量方法,以评估SLE患者使用口服类固醇的总体影响(基线负担)、益处、副作用及相关影响。

方法

制定了一项定性研究方案,从美国六家风湿病诊疗机构招募过去一年中正在接受或曾接受类固醇治疗的成年SLE患者,参与概念激发(CE)访谈。基于CE访谈结果和临床意见,开发了SLE类固醇问卷(SSQ)。对另一组SLE患者进行认知性深入访谈,评估问卷项目的内容、清晰度和相关性。根据患者反馈、临床医生审查和可翻译性评估对SSQ进行完善。该方案获得了中央独立审查委员会的批准。

结果

33名患者(52%为中度疾病严重程度;58%目前正在接受类固醇治疗,平均剂量为8.7毫克/天)完成了CE访谈。患者报告了类固醇的益处、副作用及影响。完善后的SSQ包含50个项目,用于评估类固醇剂量/疗程(4项)、总体影响(基线负担;19项)、益处(7项)、工作/生产力(3项)、副作用(10项)、情绪(6项)和总体满意度(1项)。

结论

SSQ是一种独特的PRO,采用了符合美国食品药品监督管理局PRO指南的严格科学方法开发。其旨在全面评估患者使用类固醇治疗的体验,更好地了解类固醇对SLE患者的益处和负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19d4/5331641/a44430de7951/12955_2017_609_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Treatment Satisfaction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.
J Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;23(2):94-101. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000495.
10
Patient-reported outcome measures for lupus nephritis: content validity of LupusQoL and FACIT-Fatigue.
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Sep 30;8(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00783-z.

引用本文的文献

3
Validation of a new glucocorticoid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire (the Steroid PRO).
Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Feb 15;83(3):394-400. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224946.
6
Perspectives on glucocorticoid usage in patients with adult inflammatory myopathy.
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Dec;40(12):4977-4982. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05767-8. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
7
Patient Experiences of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Findings From a Systematic Review, Meta-Summary, and Meta-Synthesis.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Nov;74(11):1813-1821. doi: 10.1002/acr.24639. Epub 2022 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

3
Treat-to-target in systemic lupus erythematosus: recommendations from an international task force.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):958-67. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-205139. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
4
The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus, 2002-2004: The Georgia Lupus Registry.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;66(2):357-68. doi: 10.1002/art.38239.
6
Predictors of organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus: the Hopkins Lupus Cohort.
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Dec;64(12):4021-8. doi: 10.1002/art.34672.
7
Incidence and US costs of corticosteroid-associated adverse events: a systematic literature review.
Clin Ther. 2011 Oct;33(10):1413-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.09.009. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
8
The cumulative burden of oral corticosteroid side effects and the economic implications of steroid use.
Respir Med. 2009 Jul;103(7):975-94. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.01.003. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
9
Prednisone, lupus activity, and permanent organ damage.
J Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;36(3):560-4. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080828. Epub 2009 Feb 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验