Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, United States of America.
University of South Florida, School of Aging Studies, United States of America.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Nov;13(8):1149-1155. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
Previous studies have suggested that frailty among older adults with cancer is associated with a variety of negative outcomes, including greater chemotherapy toxicity and worse survival. However, results often do not include patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life (QOL). The objective of this study was to evaluate frailty prior to receipt of moderately- or highly-emetogenic chemotherapy and acute changes in QOL in patients at least 65 years of age. It was hypothesized that frail patients would report greater declines in QOL.
Participants completed questionnaires before receiving their first infusion and again five days later. A 59-item deficit accumulation index score was created at baseline using a modified Rockwood frailty index. QOL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). The relationship between baseline frailty and QOL was evaluated using a dichotomized deficit accumulation index (frail vs. robust) in repeated measures ANOVA.
Study participants (n = 151) had a mean age of 72 (SD = 4.5) and 62% were female. Nearly half (42%) were frail at baseline. Frail participants reported worse QOL at baseline compared to robust participants. Frail patients reported smaller declines in overall and physical (p < 0.0001) and emotional (p = 0.006) QOL from baseline to five days after receiving chemotherapy. At five days, frail participants reported better emotional and physical QOL compared to robust participants.
Contrary to expectations, frail patients reported smaller declines in QOL compared to robust patients using a deficit accumulation index. These results can be used to help educate frail patients on what to expect during treatment.
先前的研究表明,癌症老年患者的虚弱与多种负面结果相关,包括更高的化疗毒性和更差的生存。然而,结果通常不包括患者报告的结果,如生活质量(QOL)。本研究的目的是评估在接受中度或高度致吐化疗之前的虚弱情况以及至少 65 岁患者的 QOL 急性变化。假设虚弱患者的 QOL 下降幅度更大。
参与者在接受第一次输液前和五天后再次完成问卷。使用改良的 Rockwood 虚弱指数在基线时创建了 59 项缺陷累积指数评分。使用癌症治疗功能评估一般问卷(FACT-G)评估 QOL。使用重复测量方差分析中的二分缺陷累积指数(虚弱与稳健)评估基线虚弱与 QOL 之间的关系。
研究参与者(n=151)的平均年龄为 72(SD=4.5),62%为女性。近一半(42%)在基线时虚弱。与稳健参与者相比,虚弱参与者在基线时报告的 QOL 更差。虚弱患者报告从基线到接受化疗后五天,总体和身体(p<0.0001)和情绪(p=0.006)的 QOL 下降幅度较小。在五天时,虚弱参与者报告的情绪和身体 QOL 比稳健参与者好。
与预期相反,使用缺陷累积指数,虚弱患者报告的 QOL 下降幅度比稳健患者小。这些结果可用于帮助教育虚弱患者在治疗期间的预期。