• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窦道的存在与髋关节假体感染二期翻修术后再感染相关:一项病例对照研究。

The presence of a sinus tract is associated with reinfection after two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection: a case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 7;25(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07840-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07840-0
PMID:39244574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11380202/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reinfection rates after two-stage revision (TSR) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) range from 7.9 to 14%. Many factors, including sinus tracts, are associated with reinfection after this procedure. This study aimed to delineate whether the presence of sinus tract could increase reinfection rate after TSR and to investigate other potential risk factors for reinfection after TSR.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study by retrospectively reviewing patients who underwent TSR for prosthetic hip joint infection from 2002 to 2022. The case group included patients who developed reinfection after TSR, while the control group consisted of patients who did not experience reinfection. PJI and reinfection after TSR were defined based on Delphi-based international consensus criteria. Patient demographics, past medical history, clinical manifestations, laboratory results, interval between stages, microbiological culture results were collected. Univariate analyses were utilized to assess the effect of sinus tract on reinfection and to identify other risk factors for reinfection after TSR.

RESULTS

Six patients with reinfection after TSR were included as the case group and 32 patients without reinfection were in the control group. Significant difference was observed in percentage of patients with sinus tracts between the two groups (67% in the case group versus 19% in the control group, p = 0.031, OR = 8.7). Significant difference was also found in percentage of patients with positive cultures of synovial fluid and synovium harvested during the first-stage revision between the two groups (100% in the case group versus 50% in the control group, p = 0.030). Additionally, patients in the case group had a significantly higher C-reactive protein (CRP) level prior to the second stage revision than that of patients in the control group (8.80 mg/L versus 2.36 mg/L, p = 0.005), despite normal CRP levels in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that the presence of sinus tracts could significantly increase risk of postoperative reinfection after TSR. Positive cultures during the first stage revision and elevated CRP level prior to the second stage revision could also increase the risk of reinfection after TSR. Further studies with a larger sample size are required.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

假体关节感染(PJI)行两阶段翻修(TSR)后再感染率为 7.9%至 14%。许多因素,包括窦道,与该手术后再感染有关。本研究旨在探讨窦道的存在是否会增加 TSR 后再感染的风险,并研究 TSR 后再感染的其他潜在危险因素。

方法

我们通过回顾性研究 2002 年至 2022 年期间因假体髋关节感染行 TSR 的患者,进行了病例对照研究。病例组包括 TSR 后发生再感染的患者,对照组为未发生再感染的患者。PJI 和 TSR 后再感染的定义基于基于德尔菲共识的国际标准。收集了患者的人口统计学资料、既往病史、临床表现、实验室结果、阶段间隔、微生物培养结果。采用单因素分析评估窦道对再感染的影响,并确定 TSR 后再感染的其他危险因素。

结果

6 例 TSR 后再感染的患者被纳入病例组,32 例无再感染的患者纳入对照组。两组间窦道患者比例有显著差异(病例组 67%,对照组 19%,p=0.031,OR=8.7)。两组间初次翻修时关节液和滑膜培养阳性的患者比例也有显著差异(病例组 100%,对照组 50%,p=0.030)。此外,病例组患者在进行第二期翻修前的 C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平显著高于对照组(8.80mg/L 比 2.36mg/L,p=0.005),尽管所有患者的 CRP 水平均正常。

结论

本研究表明,窦道的存在显著增加了 TSR 后术后再感染的风险。初次翻修时的培养阳性和第二期翻修前 CRP 水平升高也可能增加 TSR 后再感染的风险。需要进一步开展更大样本量的研究。

试验注册

回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6621/11380202/463abb28f7a9/12891_2024_7840_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6621/11380202/dc3b3b5a8a58/12891_2024_7840_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6621/11380202/463abb28f7a9/12891_2024_7840_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6621/11380202/dc3b3b5a8a58/12891_2024_7840_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6621/11380202/463abb28f7a9/12891_2024_7840_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The presence of a sinus tract is associated with reinfection after two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection: a case-control study.窦道的存在与髋关节假体感染二期翻修术后再感染相关:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 7;25(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07840-0.
2
What are the Factors Associated with Re-revision After One-stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip? A Case-control Study.哪些因素与髋关节假体周围感染一期翻修术后再次翻修有关?一项病例对照研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Oct;477(10):2258-2263. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000780.
3
Resection of the proximal femur during one-stage revision for infected hip arthroplasty : risk factors and effectiveness.一期翻修治疗感染性髋关节置换术后股骨近端切除:危险因素和效果。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Nov;103-B(11):1678-1685. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B11.BJJ-2021-0022.R1.
4
A Low Percentage of Patients Satisfy Typical Indications for Single-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection.仅有低比例的患者满足慢性假体周围关节感染一期翻修术的典型适应证。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Aug;478(8):1780-1786. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001243.
5
Risk factors of reinfection after prosthesis removal and antibiotic bone cement spacer implantation for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.假体取出及抗生素骨水泥间隔器植入治疗假体周围关节感染后再感染的危险因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):905. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07908-z.
6
Destination Joint Spacers: A Similar Infection-Relief Rate But Higher Complication Rate Compared with Two-Stage Revision.目的关节间隔物:与两阶段翻修相比,具有相似的感染缓解率但并发症发生率更高。
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):884-891. doi: 10.1111/os.12996. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
7
Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?水泥型全髋关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的两阶段翻修:失败风险增加?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4481-4490. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04671-3. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
8
Does Change in ESR and CRP Guide the Timing of Two-stage Arthroplasty Reimplantation?血沉和 C 反应蛋白的变化是否指导两阶段关节置换翻修的时机?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):364-371. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000533618.31937.45.
9
Are Sonication Cultures of Antibiotic Cement Spacers Useful During Second-stage Reimplantation Surgery for Prosthetic Joint Infection?抗生素骨水泥间隔器的超声培养物在人工关节感染二期翻修术中是否有用?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):1986-1992. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000257.
10
Late Reinfection May Recur More Than 5 Years After Reimplantation of THA and TKA: Analysis of Pathogen Factors.全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)翻修术后5年以上可能会再次发生晚期感染:病原体因素分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):345-352. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000050.

引用本文的文献

1
Mid-term to long-term outcome and risk factors for failure of 158 hips with two-stage revision for periprosthetic hip joint infection.158例髋关节假体周围感染二期翻修术后中期至长期结局及失败危险因素
J Bone Jt Infect. 2025 Feb 11;10(1):15-24. doi: 10.5194/jbji-10-15-2025. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Concomitant malnutrition and frailty are significant risk factors for poor outcome following two-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic joint infection.同时存在营养不良和衰弱是二期翻修治疗慢性假体周围关节感染后不良结局的重要危险因素。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 27;18(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04293-4.
2
Is long time to reimplantation a risk factor for reinfection in two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection? A systematic review of the literature.二期翻修治疗假体周围感染时,长时间再植入是否是再感染的危险因素?一项文献系统综述。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 17;10:1113006. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1113006. eCollection 2023.
3
Risk factors of reinfection after prosthesis removal and antibiotic bone cement spacer implantation for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.
假体取出及抗生素骨水泥间隔器植入治疗假体周围关节感染后再感染的危险因素。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):905. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07908-z.
4
Higher reinfection rate after two-stage revision arthroplasty in patients with refractory diabetes mellitus: a retrospective analysis with a minimum ten-year follow up.两阶段翻修术后难治性糖尿病患者的再感染率较高:一项最少十年随访的回顾性分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Nov 17;23(1):990. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05964-9.
5
Against the Norm: Do Not Rely on Serum C-Reactive Protein and White Blood Cell Count Only When Assessing Eradication of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.打破常规:评估人工关节周围感染的根除情况时,切勿仅依赖血清C反应蛋白和白细胞计数。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;11(9):1174. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11091174.
6
Diagnostic Value of CRP and Serum WBC Count during Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties.全髋关节置换术后感染二期翻修时CRP及血清白细胞计数的诊断价值
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;11(8):1098. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081098.
7
The presence of a draining sinus is associated with failure of re-implantation during two-stage exchange arthroplasty.引流窦道的存在与两阶段翻修关节成形术中再植入失败相关。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2022 Mar 22;7(2):55-60. doi: 10.5194/jbji-7-55-2022. eCollection 2022.
8
Long Term Results of Two-Stage Revision for Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection: A Multicenter Study.慢性人工髋关节感染两阶段翻修的长期结果:一项多中心研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 16;11(6):1657. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061657.
9
Intra-articular injection receipt within 3 months prior to primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with increased periprosthetic joint infection risk.在初次全膝关节置换术前 3 个月内进行关节内注射会增加假体周围关节感染的风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Dec;30(12):4088-4097. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06942-3. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
10
Predictors of Reinfection in Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Two-Stage Reimplantation.假体关节感染二期翻修术后再感染的预测因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S674-S677. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.03.017. Epub 2022 Mar 11.