Gatin Eduard, Iordache Stefan-Marian, Matei Elena, Luculescu Catalin-Romeo, Iordache Ana-Maria, Grigorescu Cristiana Eugenia Ana, Ilici Roxana Romanita
Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine ''Carol Davila'', Blv. Eroii Sanitari 8, Sector 5, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Faculty of Physics, University of Bucharest, Atomistilor 405, 077125 Magurele, Romania.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 17;12(8):1993. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081993.
(1) Background: The treatment of dental cavities and restoration of tooth shape requires specialized materials with specific clinical properties, including being easy to model, light-cured, having a natural color, reduced shrinkage, a hardness similar to hydroxyapatite, and no leakage. The dimensional stability of resin composite materials is affected by polymerization shrinkage, degree of conversion (number of π carbon bonds converted into σ ones), thermal contraction and expansion, and interactions with an aqueous environment. (2) Methods: The materials used in our investigation were two composite resins with similar polymer matrices, but different filler (micro/nano filler). To evaluate the properties of samples, we employed the pycnometer technique (pycnometer from Paul Marienfeld Gmbh, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany), RAMAN spectroscopy technique (MiniRam Equipment from B&W Tek Inc., Plainsboro Township, NJ, USA; 785 nm laser source), SEM and EDX (FEI Inspect S.). (3) Results: The size of the filler plays an important role in the polymerization: for the pycnometric results, the larger particle filler (Sample 1) seems to undergo a rapid polymerization during the 45 s curing, while the nanoparticle filer (Sample 2) needs additional curing time to fully polymerize. This is related to a much larger porosity, as proved by SEM images. The lower degree of conversion, as obtained by Raman spectroscopy, in the same geometry means that the same volume is probed for both samples, but Sample 1 is more porous, which means less amount of polymer is probed for Sample 1. (4) Conclusions: For the two composites, we obtained a degree of conversion of 59% for Sample 1 and 93% for Sample 2, after 45 s of curing.
(1)背景:龋齿的治疗和牙齿形状的修复需要具有特定临床特性的专业材料,包括易于塑形、光固化、具有自然颜色、收缩率低、硬度与羟基磷灰石相似且无渗漏。树脂复合材料的尺寸稳定性受聚合收缩、转化率(π碳键转化为σ碳键的数量)、热胀冷缩以及与水环境的相互作用影响。(2)方法:我们研究中使用的材料是两种具有相似聚合物基体但填料(微/纳米填料)不同的复合树脂。为评估样品的性能,我们采用了比重瓶技术(德国劳达-柯尼希斯霍芬的保罗·玛丽恩费尔德有限公司生产的比重瓶)、拉曼光谱技术(美国新泽西州普林斯顿镇B&W Tek公司的MiniRam设备;785纳米激光源)、扫描电子显微镜和能谱分析(FEI Inspect S.)。(3)结果:填料的尺寸在聚合过程中起重要作用:对比重瓶测量结果而言,较大颗粒填料(样品1)在45秒固化过程中似乎经历快速聚合,而纳米颗粒填料(样品2)需要额外固化时间才能完全聚合。扫描电子显微镜图像证明,这与大得多的孔隙率有关。拉曼光谱测得的相同几何形状下较低的转化率意味着两个样品探测的体积相同,但样品1孔隙更多,这意味着样品1探测到的聚合物量更少。(4)结论:对于这两种复合材料,固化45秒后,我们测得样品1的转化率为59%,样品2的转化率为93%。