Suppr超能文献

如何验证不存在——无菌藻类培养的挑战。

How to Verify Non-Presence-The Challenge of Axenic Algae Cultivation.

机构信息

Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.

Joint Microbiome Facility of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Cells. 2022 Aug 20;11(16):2594. doi: 10.3390/cells11162594.

Abstract

Many phycological applications require the growth and maintenance of pure algae cultures. In some research areas, such as biochemistry and physiology, axenic growth is essential to avoid misinterpretations caused by contaminants. Nonetheless, axenicity-defined as the state of only a single strain being present, free of any other organism-needs to be verified. We compare the available methods to assess axenicity. We first purified unialgal cultures with an established series of axenicity treatments, and by including two additional treatment steps. The presumable axenic cultures were then tested for their axenic state by applying conventional tests on LB (lysogeny broth) agar-plates, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, flow-cytometry and epifluorescence microscopy. Only the plate tests indicated axenic conditions. We found a linear relationship between total cell counts of contaminants achieved by flow cytometry and epifluorescence microscopy, with flow cytometry counts being consistently higher. In addition, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing demonstrated its superiority by not only being an efficient tool for axenicity testing, but also for identification of persistent contaminants. Although classic plate tests are still commonly used to verify axenicity, we found the LB-agar-plate technique to be inappropriate. Cultivation-independent methods are highly recommended to test for axenic conditions. A combination of flow-cytometry and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing complement each other and will yield the most reliable result.

摘要

许多藻类学应用都需要培养和维持纯藻培养物。在一些研究领域,如生物化学和生理学,无菌生长对于避免由污染物引起的误解至关重要。然而,无菌性(即只存在单一菌株,没有任何其他生物体)需要得到验证。我们比较了现有的评估无菌性的方法。我们首先用一系列已建立的无菌性处理方法来纯化单藻培养物,并增加了两个额外的处理步骤。然后,通过在 LB(溶菌肉汤)琼脂平板上进行常规测试、16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序、流式细胞术和荧光显微镜检查,来测试假定的无菌培养物的无菌状态。只有平板测试表明了无菌条件。我们发现,通过流式细胞术和荧光显微镜计数达到的污染物总细胞计数之间存在线性关系,流式细胞术计数始终更高。此外,16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序不仅是一种有效的无菌性测试工具,而且还能鉴定持续存在的污染物,因此具有优越性。虽然经典的平板测试仍然常用于验证无菌性,但我们发现 LB-琼脂平板技术并不合适。建议使用非培养依赖的方法来测试无菌条件。流式细胞术和 16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序的结合相互补充,将产生最可靠的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efef/9406910/d7c52c846722/cells-11-02594-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验