Sand P K, Hill R C, Ostergard D R
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jul;70(1):57-60.
Two hundred eighteen women undergoing multichannel urethrocystometry were also studied with supine urethroscopic cystometry and/or standing single-channel cystometry to evaluate the use of the latter two studies in screening patients at risk for detrusor instability. Thirty-one percent of the women were found to have detrusor instability on multichannel urethrocystometry. Only 24.6% of these patients were detected with supine urethroscopic cystometry, whereas 59.3% were detected with standing single-channel cystometry. The specificity of these tests was better (94.4 and 82.4%, respectively) than the above sensitivities, but analysis of their predictive values confirmed that they are both poor screening tools for populations at risk for detrusor instability.
对218名接受多通道尿道膀胱测压的女性,还采用仰卧位尿道膀胱镜测压和/或站立位单通道膀胱测压进行研究,以评估后两种检查在筛查存在逼尿肌不稳定风险患者中的应用。在多通道尿道膀胱测压中,31%的女性被发现存在逼尿肌不稳定。这些患者中,仰卧位尿道膀胱镜测压仅检测出24.6%,而站立位单通道膀胱测压检测出59.3%。这些检查的特异性更好(分别为94.4%和82.4%),高于上述敏感性,但对其预测价值的分析证实,它们都是筛查逼尿肌不稳定风险人群的较差工具。