Serafin Marco, Fastuca Rosamaria, Caprioglio Alberto
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Independent Researcher, 21100 Varese, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 20;11(16):4887. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164887.
The aim of the present study was to compare skeletal and dental changes after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and slow maxillary expansion (SME) performed by a Leaf Expander (LE) with upper deciduous teeth as anchorage and using 3D CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) analysis. Mixed dentition patients were randomly divided in two groups, according to the different expansion used anchored on maxillary primary second molars: the RME group ( = 16) was treated with a Hyrax type expander, whereas the SME group ( = 16) was treated with an LE expander. CBCT scans were performed before (T1) and after treatment (T2) and analyzed with a custom landmarks system. A paired -test was used for intragroup analysis between T1 and T2, and a Student t-test was used for intergroup analysis; statistical significance was set at 0.05. Both RME and SME groups showed a statistically significant increase in dental and skeletal diameters. Group comparisons between T1 and T2 showed a significant expansion rate in the RME group for upper permanent molars ( = 0.025) but not for deciduous molars ( = 0.790). Moreover, RME showed higher increases for skeletal expansion evaluated at nasal walls ( = 0.041), whereas at pterygoid plates did not show any significant differences compared with the SME group ( = 0.849). A significant transverse expansion could be achieved with the expander anchored on deciduous teeth. RME and SME produced effective both skeletal and dentoalveolar transverse expansion; RME produced more anterior expansion than SME but less control regarding the permanent molar decompensation. SME by LE therefore could be an efficient and helpful alternative in the treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency in growing patients.
本研究的目的是比较使用叶状扩弓器(LE)以上颌乳牙为支抗,通过快速上颌扩弓(RME)和慢速上颌扩弓(SME)后的骨骼和牙齿变化,并采用三维锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)分析。混合牙列患者根据上颌乳第二磨牙上使用的不同扩弓方式随机分为两组:RME组(n = 16)采用Hyrax型扩弓器治疗,而SME组(n = 16)采用LE扩弓器治疗。在治疗前(T1)和治疗后(T2)进行CBCT扫描,并使用自定义标志点系统进行分析。组内T1和T2之间的分析采用配对t检验,组间分析采用学生t检验;统计学显著性设定为0.05。RME组和SME组的牙齿和骨骼直径均有统计学显著增加。T1和T2之间的组间比较显示,RME组上颌恒牙磨牙有显著的扩弓率(P = 0.025),但乳牙磨牙无显著扩弓率(P = 0.790)。此外,RME在鼻壁处评估的骨骼扩弓增加更高(P = 0.041),而在翼突板处与SME组相比没有显示出任何显著差异(P = 0.849)。使用以乳牙为支抗的扩弓器可以实现显著的横向扩弓。RME和SME均能有效实现骨骼和牙槽横向扩弓;RME比SME产生更多的前部扩弓,但在恒牙磨牙去代偿方面控制较少。因此,LE进行的SME可能是治疗生长发育期患者上颌横向发育不足的一种有效且有用的替代方法。