Suppr超能文献

竖脊肌平面阻滞对围手术期疼痛以外的情况有效吗?一项回顾性分析。

Is the Erector Spinae Plane Block Effective for More than Perioperative Pain? A Retrospective Analysis.

作者信息

Hochberg Uri, Brill Silviu, Ofir Dror, Salame Khalil, Lidar Zvi, Regev Gilad, Khashan Morsi

机构信息

Division of Anesthesiology, Institute of Pain Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel.

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 21;11(16):4902. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164902.

Abstract

Introduction: The thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is an ultrasound-guided block that has gained popularity and is widely used in acute pain setups. However, data regarding its role in chronic and cancer-related pain are anecdotal. Material and Methods: The study is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent ESPB. The cohort was divided into subgroups based on three determinants: etiology, pain type, and chronicity. Results: One hundred and ten patients were included, and genders were affected equally. The average age was 61.2 ± 16.1 years. The whole group had a statistically significant reduction in a numerical rating scale (NRS) (7.4 ± 1.4 vs. 5.0 ± 2.6, p-value > 0.001). NRS reduction for 45 patients (41%) exceeded 50% of the pre-procedural NRS. The mean follow-up was 7.9 ± 4.6 weeks. Baseline and post-procedure NRS were comparable between all subgroups. The post-procedural NRS was significantly lower than the pre-procedural score within each group. The proportion of patients with over 50% improvement in NRS was lower for those with symptom duration above 12 months (p-value = 0.02). Conclusions: Thoracic ESPB is a simple and safe technique. The results support the possible role of ESPB for chronic as well as cancer-related pain.

摘要

引言

胸椎竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)是一种超声引导下的阻滞技术,已受到广泛关注并在急性疼痛治疗中广泛应用。然而,关于其在慢性疼痛和癌症相关疼痛中的作用的数据仍属 anecdotal(此处疑有误,可能是“轶事性的”,推测原文想表达的是“零星的、不确切的”)。

材料与方法

本研究是对接受ESPB治疗的患者进行的回顾性分析。根据三个决定因素将队列分为亚组:病因、疼痛类型和慢性程度。

结果

纳入110例患者,男女受影响程度相同。平均年龄为61.2±16.1岁。整个组在数字评分量表(NRS)上有统计学意义的降低(7.4±1.4对5.0±2.6,p值>0.001)。45例患者(41%)的NRS降低超过术前NRS的50%。平均随访时间为7.9±4.6周。所有亚组的基线和术后NRS具有可比性。每组术后NRS均显著低于术前评分。症状持续时间超过12个月的患者NRS改善超过50%的比例较低(p值=0.02)。

结论

胸椎ESPB是一种简单安全的技术。结果支持ESPB在慢性疼痛以及癌症相关疼痛中可能发挥的作用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
When to consider "mixed pain"? The right questions can make a difference!何时考虑“混合性疼痛”?正确的问题可能会产生影响!
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Dec;36(12):2037-2046. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1832058. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验