Particle Distribution and Heat Transfer of SiO/Water Nanofluid in the Turbulent Tube Flow.

In order to clarify the effect of particle coagulation on the heat transfer properties, the governing equations of nanofluid together with the equation for nanoparticles in the SiO/water nanofluid flowing through a turbulent tube are solved numerically in the range of Reynolds number 3000 ≤ Re ≤ 16,000 and particle volume fraction 0.005 ≤ ≤ 0.04. Some results are validated by comparing with the experimental results. The effect of particle convection, diffusion, and coagulation on the pressure drop ∆, particle distribution, and heat transfer of nanofluid are analyzed. The main innovation is that it gives the effect of particle coagulation on the pressure drop, particle distribution, and heat transfer. The results showed that ∆ increases with the increase in Re and . When inlet velocity is small, the increase in ∆ caused by adding particles is relatively large, and ∆ increases most obviously compared with the case of pure water when the inlet velocity is 0.589 m/s and is 0.004. Particle number concentration decreases along the flow direction, and near the wall is decreased to the original 2% and decreased by about 90% in the central area. increases with increasing Re but with decreasing , and basically presents a uniform distribution in the core area of the tube. The geometric mean diameter of particle GMD increases with increasing , but with decreasing Re. GMD is the minimum in the inlet area, and gradually increases along the flow direction. The geometric standard deviation of particle diameter GSD increases sharply at the inlet and decreases in the inlet area, remains almost unchanged in the whole tube, and finally decreases rapidly again at the outlet. The effects of Re and on the variation in GSD along the flow direction are insignificant. The values of convective heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt number are larger for nanofluids than that for pure water. and increase with the increase in Re and . Interestingly, the variation in from 0.005 to 0.04 has little effect on and .