Chen Can, Patterson Benjamin, Simpson Ruan, Li Yanli, Chen Zhangzhang, Lv Qianzhou, Guo Daqiao, Li Xiaoyu, Fu Weiguo, Guo Baolei
Department of Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 9;9:949538. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.949538. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to determine the association between fluoroquinolones (FQs) use, the risk of aortic aneurysm or dissection (AAD), and the prognosis of patients with pre-existing AAD.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science on 31 March 2022. Observational studies that evaluated the association of FQs with AAD risk in the general population or FQs with the prognosis of patients with preexisting AAD and presented adjusted effect estimates were included. Two reviewers assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE.
Of the 13 included studies, 11 focused on the association of FQs with AAD incidence, and only one study investigated the association of FQs with the patient with AAD prognosis. FQ use was associated with an increased risk of AAD within 30 days (RR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.11-1.81; very low certainty) and 60 days (RR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.26-1.64; low certainty). Specifically, the association was significant when compared with amoxicillin, azithromycin, doxycycline, or no antibiotic use. Furthermore, patients with preexisting AAD exposure to FQ had an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.50-1.73; moderate certainty) and aortic-specific mortality (RR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.50-2.15; moderate certainty), compared to the non-exposed FQ group within a 60-day risk period.
FQs were associated with an increased incidence of AAD in the general population and a higher risk of adverse outcomes in patients with preexisting AAD. Nevertheless, the results may be affected by unmeasured confounding factors. This should be considered by physicians contemplating using FQs in patients with aortic dilation and those at high risk of AAD.
[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021230171].
本研究旨在确定氟喹诺酮类药物(FQs)的使用与主动脉瘤或夹层(AAD)风险之间的关联,以及已有AAD患者的预后情况。
我们于2022年3月31日检索了PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL、Scopus和Web of Science数据库。纳入评估FQs与普通人群中AAD风险的关联或FQs与已有AAD患者预后的关联并给出调整后效应估计值的观察性研究。两名研究者评估研究的纳入资格、提取数据,并使用GRADE评估偏倚风险和证据的确定性。
在纳入的13项研究中,11项聚焦于FQs与AAD发病率的关联,仅有一项研究调查了FQs与AAD患者预后的关联。使用FQs与30天内AAD风险增加相关(风险比:1.42;95%置信区间:1.11 - 1.81;极低确定性)以及60天内相关(风险比:1.44;95%置信区间:1.26 - 1.64;低确定性)。具体而言,与阿莫西林、阿奇霉素、多西环素或不使用抗生素相比,这种关联具有显著性。此外,在60天的风险期内,已有AAD且接触FQs的患者全因死亡率增加(风险比:1.61;95%置信区间:1.50 - 1.73;中等确定性)以及主动脉特异性死亡率增加(风险比:1.80;95%置信区间:1.50 - 2.15;中等确定性),与未接触FQs组相比。
FQs与普通人群中AAD发病率增加以及已有AAD患者不良结局风险较高相关。然而,结果可能受到未测量的混杂因素影响。考虑在主动脉扩张患者和AAD高风险患者中使用FQs的医生应考虑到这一点。