Suppr超能文献

氟喹诺酮类药物与其他抗生素相比的严重心血管不良事件:一项自身对照病例系列分析。

Serious cardiovascular adverse events with fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics: A self-controlled case series analysis.

机构信息

VA Center for Medication Safety, Hines, IL, USA.

VA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00664. doi: 10.1002/prp2.664.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between fluoroquinolone (FQ) use and the occurrence of aortic aneurysm/dissection (AA/AD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ventricular arrhythmias (VenA), and all-cause mortality vs other commonly used antibiotics. We conducted a self-controlled case series analysis of patients who experienced the outcomes of AA/AD, AMI, and VenA, based on diagnosis codes from emergency department visits and hospitalizations within Veterans Health Administration, and death in FY2014-FY2018. These Veterans also received outpatient prescriptions for FQs. Conditional Poisson regression models were used to estimate the association between FQs and each of the outcomes vs antibiotics of interest (ie amoxicillin or amoxicillin/clavulanate, azithromycin, doxycycline, cefuroxime or cephalexin, or sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim), adjusted for time-varying covariates. Using a 30-day risk period after each antibiotic prescription, adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) for FQs vs each comparator antibiotic were not statistically different for outcomes of VenA or AMI. For AA/AD, incidence was higher during FQ risk periods vs amoxicillin [aIRR 1.50 (95% CI 1.01, 2.25)] and azithromycin [aIRR 2.15 (95% CI 1.27, 3.64)] risk periods. A significantly increased risk of mortality was observed with FQs vs each antibiotic of interest. FQs were associated with an increased risk of AA/AD vs amoxicillin and azithromycin and an increased risk of all-cause mortality vs multiple antibiotics commonly used for outpatient infections. Although the differences in event rates are small, FQ use should be limited to serious infections without appropriate alternatives.

摘要

本研究旨在评估氟喹诺酮(FQ)的使用与主动脉瘤/夹层(AA/AD)、急性心肌梗死(AMI)、室性心律失常(VenA)以及全因死亡率之间的关联,与其他常用抗生素相比。我们基于退伍军人事务部就诊和住院的诊断代码,以及 2014 财年至 2018 财年的死亡数据,对经历 AA/AD、AMI 和 VenA 结局的患者进行了自身对照病例系列分析。这些退伍军人还接受了 FQ 的门诊处方。我们使用条件泊松回归模型来估计 FQ 与每种结局(即阿莫西林或阿莫西林/克拉维酸、阿奇霉素、多西环素、头孢呋辛或头孢氨苄或磺胺甲噁唑-甲氧苄啶)之间的关联,调整了随时间变化的协变量。在每种抗生素处方后使用 30 天风险期,FQ 与每种比较抗生素的调整后的发病率比(aIRR)在 VenA 或 AMI 结局方面没有统计学差异。对于 AA/AD,FQ 风险期的发生率高于阿莫西林[aIRR 1.50(95%CI 1.01,2.25)]和阿奇霉素[aIRR 2.15(95%CI 1.27,3.64)]风险期。与每种感兴趣的抗生素相比,FQ 与死亡率增加显著相关。与每种常用的门诊感染抗生素相比,FQ 与 AA/AD 风险增加以及全因死亡率增加相关。尽管事件发生率差异较小,但 FQ 的使用应限于没有适当替代方案的严重感染。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b5c/7550792/538c81c06d4e/PRP2-8-e00664-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验