School of Physical Education and Sports Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 51000, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Aug 16;2022:2130993. doi: 10.1155/2022/2130993. eCollection 2022.
V̇Omax, a gold standard for evaluating cardiorespiratory fitness, can be enhanced by training and will gradually decrease when training stops. This study, which followed the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, is aimed at assessing the effect of short- and long-term detraining on trained individuals' V̇Omax through a systematic review and meta-analysis and performed a subgroup analysis to evaluate the effects of different ages, detraining formats, and training statuses on V̇Omax variation between short- and long-term training cessation. Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, PubMed, and Scopus, four databases, were searched, from which 21 of 3315 potential studies met the inclusion criteria. Significant decreases in V̇Omax were identified after short-term training cessation (ES = -0.62 [95% CI -0.94; -0.31], < 0.01; within-group = 35.3%, Egger's test = -1.22, = 0.335) and long-term training cessation (ES = -1.42 [95% CI -1.99; -0.84], < 0.01; within-group = 76.3%, Egger's test = -3.369, < 0.01), which shows that the detraining effect was found to be larger on V̇Omax in long-term training cessation than in short-term training cessation ( = 6.5, = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference regarding V̇Omax change between 30-90 days detraining and larger than 90 days detraining ( = 0.54, = 0.46) when conducting subgroup analysis. In addition, younger (<20) individuals showed a greater reduction in V̇Omax after long-term detraining than adult individuals ( = 5.9, = 0.05), and athletes with higher trained-state V̇Omax showed a significant decline in V̇Omax after long-term detraining compared with the lower trained-state group ( = 4.24, = 0.03). In conclusion, both short- and long-term training cessation have a detrimental effect on V̇Omax, and a greater impact on V̇Omax was found in long-term training cessation compared to short-term training cessation; however, there was no significant change in V̇Omax when the duration of training cessation was more than 30 days. To buffer the detrimental effects of detraining, especially long-term training cessation, performing some physical exercise during training cessation can effectively weaken detraining effects. Thus, to prevent athlete's V̇Omax from decreasing dramatically from detraining, athletes should continue performing some physical exercise during the cessation of training.
V̇Omax 是评估心肺适能的金标准,可以通过训练得到提高,并且在训练停止后会逐渐下降。本研究遵循考科蓝协作的指导原则,旨在通过系统评价和荟萃分析评估短期和长期停训对训练者 V̇Omax 的影响,并进行亚组分析,以评估不同年龄、停训方式和训练状态对短期和长期停训后 V̇Omax 变化的影响。从 Web of Science、SPORTDiscus、PubMed 和 Scopus 四个数据库中检索到 3315 项潜在研究,其中 21 项符合纳入标准。研究发现,短期停训后 V̇Omax 显著下降(ES = -0.62 [95% CI -0.94; -0.31], < 0.01;组内 = 35.3%,Egger 检验 = -1.22, = 0.335),长期停训后 V̇Omax 也显著下降(ES = -1.42 [95% CI -1.99; -0.84], < 0.01;组内 = 76.3%,Egger 检验 = -3.369, < 0.01),这表明长期停训对 V̇Omax 的影响大于短期停训( = 6.5, = 0.01)。然而,当进行亚组分析时,30-90 天和大于 90 天的停训之间的 V̇Omax 变化没有显著差异( = 0.54, = 0.46)。此外,年轻(<20 岁)个体在长期停训后 V̇Omax 的下降幅度大于成年个体( = 5.9, = 0.05),而高水平训练状态下的运动员在长期停训后 V̇Omax 显著下降,与低水平训练状态组相比( = 4.24, = 0.03)。总之,短期和长期停训都会对 V̇Omax 产生不利影响,并且长期停训对 V̇Omax 的影响大于短期停训;然而,当停训时间超过 30 天时,V̇Omax 没有显著变化。为了缓冲停训的不利影响,特别是长期停训的影响,在停训期间进行一些身体运动可以有效减弱停训的影响。因此,为了防止运动员因停训而导致 V̇Omax 急剧下降,运动员在停训期间应继续进行一些身体运动。