Suppr超能文献

Learning effects, variation during office hours and reproducibility of static and dynamic spirometry.

作者信息

Larsson K, Hedenström H, Malmberg P

出版信息

Respiration. 1987;51(3):214-22. doi: 10.1159/000195204.

Abstract

Static and dynamic spirometric tests were performed in 21 healthy subjects (21-61 years old, 8 smokers and 9 ex-smokers) on 3 different days within 2 weeks. The design of the study allowed separation of the influence of learning and diurnal changes between 09.00 and 17.00 h. In addition, the reproducibility of the tests and the effect of inhalation of 2.5 mg of terbutaline sulphate were studied. No learning effect was observed. There were slight, but statistically significant differences between morning, noon and afternoon measurements. Thus, the residual volume and flow in the early phase of forced expiration were highest in the afternoon, while maximal voluntary ventilation was lower at noon than in the afternoon or morning. The intraindividual variabilities (defined as standard deviation of difference between first and second measurement) of total lung capacity, vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were about 3% of the predicted values. The ratio of intra- to interindividual variability was 0.2-0.3. The remaining tests showed higher variability and a higher intra- to interindividual variability ratio. Terbutaline inhalation caused a significant increase in most forced expiratory flow variables. A 10% increase in FEV1 corresponded to a 50-60% increase in endexpiratory flow. In spite of this, the endexpiratory flow and mean transit time were better discriminators of the effects of bronchodilation in normal subjects.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验